What's New

I want to explore some less crowded places near Lake Louise where I can enjoy the mountain scenery and take in the views without the large crowds around the main lakeshore. Are there any nearby viewpoints, quiet trails, or scenic spots that are worth visiting? I'm looking for places that are relatively peaceful, easy to reach, and offer beautiful views of the surrounding mountains or lakes. Short walks are fine, but I'm not looking for a strenuous hike.I would appreciate any recommendations for hidden gems or quieter alternatives around the Lake Louise area.

Hi everyone, I’m taking my family (2 adults, kids aged 10 & 12) to NZ’s South Island for 11 days from August 14-25. We’re doing the Routeburn Track (4 days) and then touring Queenstown and Te Anau. We have 2 phones (iPhone 14 Pro and Pixel 7) plus an inReach Mini 2 and need mobile data for everyday logistics. My current thought is to try TooSIM for New Zealand, 10GB/30 day plan priced at $17.99. I’m comparing this against Airalo, which offers a similar 10GB plan but for $23.50. Looking for a SIM card in Queenstown with jetlagged kids is a hassle I’d rather avoid. For context, we are strictly using data for logistics, not entertainment, so top speed isn't our priority - reliability is. I’m concerned about backcountry coverage. Has anyone used TooSIM for New Zealand? They use the One NZ network. Has anyone had a usable signal near the Divide car park with their coverage? We plan to share one phone’s hotspot between all of us to stretch the 10GB, which should suffice for maps, weather, and brief messages over 11 days, as long as we don’t stream.

Thanks for sharing this insightful account of your PCT journey. Your point about perseverance, community, and the mental side of thru hiking really resonates. The trail clearly offers much more than just incredible scenery it can be a truly life changing experience.

Unless I’m mistaken, after trying out a modern backpacking chair for the first time and taking it on that first trip, I’ve taken a chair on every backpacking trip since. That’s a solid 10+ years of backpacking. While the limited use of a chair and the extra, non-necessary weight carried may go against ultralight principles, the comfort in camp is worth it. And with many of my trips featuring a blend of miles plus extra activities like photography or fishing or just watching the scenery, there is some time in camp to be had. Modern backpacking chair options, such as the REI Co-op Flexlite Air Chair shown here, can offer packability and quite a bit of comfort for around a pound. Best Backpacking Chairs For me and when it comes to backpacking chairs with legs, it all started with Alite Designs Monarch Chair, now known and offered as the Grand Trunk Alite Monarch Chair. You can read our full review of the Monarch Chair here. This $90, 18 ounce chair packs up small and is unique in that it has only 2 legs. If this has you skeptical at first, I can tell you right away that it’s easier to balance on this chair than one might at first think, and it makes a lounging, legs-extended position quite comfortable. That said, for sitting upright and cooking it can be a little uneasy at times, and yes, I’ve tipped completely over backwards once…or twice. Balanced on the Alite Monarch Chair For more stability with 4 legs you have a few options here. One can be found in the Helinox Chair Zero ($140, 17 ounces) – find our full Helinox Chair Zero Review here. This chair has the additional stability (although with any backpacking chair, you have to be careful) and is especially comfortable again in a legs-extended position which is great for the knees at the end of the hiking day. This chair has a more upright seating posture and is a bit higher off the ground than some competitors, all of which makes it easier to get in and out of. Additionally, multiple versions of this chair are available such as a large and a highback. Helinox Chair Zero For a bit less weight however, the Flexlite Air Chair from REI Co-op ($100, 16 ounces) is quite the contender. Read our Flexlite Air Chair review for all the details, however to summarize you’ll be going about as light as you get here and this chair has a relaxed and a bit lower seating position, but is most comfortable knees bent or legs crossed – which is perfect for preparing a meal in camp. Legs extended I find the seat fabric cuts into your legs a bit, but I do often find myself taking this chair on trips considering its light weight. REI Co-op Flexlite Air Chair When I want acceptable weight but it’s a more relaxed trip and comfort is a priority, the Helinox Ground Chair ($140, 23 ounces) is my preferred option (see more here: Helinox Ground Chair Review). This one is getting a bit heavy, but I find this chair to be really quite comfortable in a lounging position and it works fine knees-bent as well. Helinox Ground Chair The only con (other than weight) on this chair is that – appropriate to its name – it's just about right on the ground. Getting in and out can be a bit of a chore, but once you’re there this is the most comfortable chair option I’ve used in the backcountry. Summary: Best Backpacking Chairs Grand Trunk Alite Designs Monarch Chair Helinox Chair Zero REI-Co-op Flexlite Air Chair Helinox Ground Chair Other Backpacking Seating Options You can save a bit of weight by going with a stool option. For my backpacking at this point I’d rather go with the heaviest of all options – a rock close to my campsite rather than a stool, so it’s chair or nothing for me or you could just go with a backpacking sit pad. However, preferences vary. Additionally if you pack a bear canister, you can just use that, and Crazy Creek has offered chair options (this was actually my first backpacking chair some 30 years ago) that have you sitting in the chair on the ground for many years. If not and a stool works for you, we’ll keep it simple here: the REI Co-op Flexlite Air Stool (about $70, 12 ounces) is an option that will save just a bit of weight over a chair and admittedly, does offer an upgrade over a sitpad or rock. Backpacking chairs can be convenient on everything from a day hike to extended trips, and can offer a place to sit when there isn't really one available. Conclusion While a chair for most of us is not a necessary item for backpacking but is indeed one that is appreciated if you’re spending any amount of downtime in camp, as a luxury it's one where I do look to keep the weight as low as possible. Thankfully, there are a few options out there these days that work for various preferences in regards to seating posture and several different options to suit preferences in regards to comfort. While I still wish every chair I’ve ever carried was just a bit lighter, the weight has always been worth it. For a full selection of backpacking and camp chairs, take a look at this page at REI-Co-op.

While the popularity of using trail-running shoes or otherwise trail-appropriate low shoes for hiking and backpacking has only risen in recent years and continues on that track – my hiking included – there are times when only a proper boot will do. Take a look at our footwear guide (by season) for help deciding between a low shoe or a high hiking boot. And while the trail-runners vs. boots debate (as with all trail gear) will surely only continue, if you’ve decided on a boot, in this article we’ll look at some of the best breathable, waterproof, and winter boots for your next hike. Best Summer Hiking & Backpacking Boots For summer conditions a mesh, breathable boot will be in order. Mid-height boots are of particular relevance to these hot and dry conditions, while keeping things lighter weight than a high hiking boot, and with breathability increasing foot comfort (and less chance of blisters). Unfortunately, boots meeting these criteria are few and far between. With a trail-running shoe heritage, the Lone Altra Peak Hiker series (non-waterproof, $160) is a top choice in this category with plenty of room for your toes, and could be an especially suitable choice if you can’t decide between a boot and a trail-runner. This boot is mid-height and lightweight with zero heel-to-toe drop, but with a sufficient stack height for moderate cushioning as the miles go by. This is a proven shoe-based design and if you’re looking for a minimal hiking / backpacking boot (but not too minimal) for summer hikes look no further. For something a little more traditional take a look at the Merrell Moab 3 Mid hiking boots (non-waterproof version, $150) in the men’s version or the women’s version. This in a more traditional hiking boot fashion has a significant leather overlay – not the best for dry times in my experience, but the added durability that leather offers over mesh cannot be questioned. However, rather than completely encapsulating your foot in thick leather like a traditional boot, this mid-height option has a nice mix of leather and mesh for breathability on those summer hikes. Vibram soles round out the package. However be aware that these boots have a higher 11.5mm drop from heel to toe; these will be more like a traditional boot in that regard. This boot is available in standard or wide sizes. Although a winter scene is shown here, you can see how leather has a propensity to soak up water. Dry time is long. Leather will require more maintenance. See our gear maintenance & repair guide for details on waterproofing leather boots. Summary: Best Summer Hiking & Backpacking Boots Altra Lone Peak Hiker Merrell Moab 3 Mid (Ventilated) Best Shoulder Season / Mild Winter Boots It seems like every manufacturer wants to throw in a Gore-Tex or otherwise waterproof lining to every boot that steps off the assembly line, and while this wouldn’t be my first choice for summer hikes as we’ve previously covered, these boots are perhaps the most versatile and are the bread and butter category of hiking boots. One of my favorite mainstream manufacturers – Vasque – typically had some of the most solid offerings in this category for as long as I can remember, with good fit options. Sadly and as they’ve ceased operations just recently, we need to turn to other options these days. In this category you’ll find the boots that are perfect for dealing with light moisture or snow and possibly chilly conditions. Additionally, they can be used in summer (albeit with sweaty feet and slower-drying boots), and pushed into winter as well especially with hiking / backpacking gaiters and if you use a vapor barrier liner system and warm socks. I’ve found just about all boots in this category seem to run a bit narrow and tight in the toebox, other than Altra, thus I have to either size up into a new size for width, or go for a shoe that comes in wide widths or is by default wider than average. Obviously, the wider shoe in the right size is the better choice than sizing up to gain width. Gore-Tex liner in a waterproof / breathable hiking boot. One perennial and popular choice can be found in the Salomon X Ultra 5 Mid GORE-TEX hiking boots ($190). Salomon in the past ran their metal eyelets all the way down the boot which I never found to be comfortable, but thankfully this has been updated on recent models. The X Ultra series can be found in both men’s and women’s versions and offers an all-around, middle of the road feature set. This boot has an 11mm heel-toe drop. Merrell offers their very popular Moab series here in the Merrell Moab 3 Mid GORE-TEX ($190). While a leather boot – which I like as a natural material, but do not like due to long dry times and a propensity to soak up water – Merrell has luckily designed this one with plenty of ventilation boosting and weight saving cutouts (it has never made sense to me to make a Gore-Tex boot, and then completely encapsulate it in leather). This boot has an 11.5mm drop which as a zero-drop guy, I feel is high but this would be a choice if you like a traditional hiking boot type of feel, but are looking for something lightweight and more mobile. If you perhaps already hike in the Altra Olympus trail running shoe in the summer, then a cushioned yet zero-drop boot would be a logical choice for wetter hikes. The Olympus 6 Hike Mid GTX adds the height, although Altra (back to leather) has covered most of the shoe with it. That said, if you are an Altra and especially an Olympus fan, the fit and ride might override this for you. We’ll keep fingers crossed on a GTX Lone Peak Mid, however Altra did just release the Timp 6 Mid GTX Boot. Stay tuned for updates. Previous stated caveats aside, if you’re looking for a tough, traditional leather, Gore-Tex, higher backpacking type boot that comes in regular (even narrow!) or wide sizes, look no further than the Lowa Renegade EVO GTX series ($280) for a solid, classic example in this category. And on to high stack height enthusiasts, Hoka has you covered with the HOKA Kaha 3 GTX hiking boots that have around an 8mm drop but all the way up to a 40mm stack height in the heel. Summary: Best Shoulder Season / Mild Winter Boots Salomon X Ultra 5 Mid GORE-TEX Merrell Moab 3 Mid GORE-TEX Altra Olympus 6 Hike Mid GTX Lowa Renegade EVO GTX HOKA Kaha 3 GTX Hiking Boots Best Deep Winter / Cold Weather Hiking & Backpacking Boots When it comes to deep winter and extreme cold, you can only push a typical waterproof / breathable boot so far. At some point, insulation will be needed. This will vary person to person, and depends on conditions, but for me I find around 10F or colder to be about the point where I’ll reach for an insulated boot over one that’s not. This adds a bit of weight, but warmth is worth it. In this category breathability is less critical – the outside of your boot will likely be frozen anyway. For warmer (less cold?) conditions in this category we can look to boots very similar to the section above but with a 200g insulation layer added as can be found in the Merrell Thermo Chill 2 Mid waterproof boots ($150). which gets you a boot pretty close to the bread and butter category of boots we’ve previously discussed, but with an insulation boost for cold weather. Thick socks will only go so far; for very cold conditions a properly insulated boot will be needed. However for more extreme conditions you will ideally want to go with more of a boot that has been designed from the ground up for winter and cold conditions. The Salomon Toundra Pro ($200), with Aerogel insulation and a -4F (stationary) comfort rating offers additional warmth and a higher cut along with an overall design more suited for deep winter conditions from the tread on up. This one can be hard to find as of late. You can try at the aforementioned link and also at REI: men's and women's. If that’s not enough, a proper bunny boot may be in order. Take a look at Alaska Gear Company’s Bunny Boot VBX ($260-$390) – this one is insulated with waterproofed wool felt insulation and comes in several temperature ratings (rated to as cold as -79F!) depending on your exact needs. If you’ll be hiking through extreme cold and deep snow and also need your feet to be warm while stationary, a boot of this nature will be the best suited option, and frankly, the warmer the better when it gets this cold. Summary: Best Deep Winter / Cold Weather Hiking & Backpacking Boots Merrell Thermo Chill 2 Mid Waterproof Boots Salomon Toundra Pro Alaska Gear Company Bunny Boot VBX Conclusion The benefits that a mid or high boot can offer cannot be replicated by a low hiking shoe. However, choose carefully – extra weight on your feet weighs more than extra weight in your pack. That said, if you’re headed out on an expedition type trip with a heavy pack or hiking in deep snow there are indeed times when a boot can make all the difference. As with all footwear, hiking or not, fit is the most important consideration here along with the features you need – nobody enjoys having to stop on a lunch break to fix hot spots or worse having to constantly battle blisters on a trip. Likely, the best hiking boot for you will be the one that simply fits the best (note that all boots detailed here are available in both men’s and women’s versions and many in various widths). After that, so long as the boot is sufficiently durable, warm enough and waterproof enough, and not overly expensive for the budget, all you have to worry about is where those boots will take you on your next trip. For more on features to look for and selection strategy, see our article Choosing the Best Backpacking & Hiking Shoes or Boots. If you've decided to go with a shoe however, see our Best Hiking and Backpacking Shoes by Category article. For a full selection of hiking and backpacking boots, see this page at REI Co-op.

While we’ve reviewed a few versions of the Lone Peak over the years, most of the changes and updates to this shoe have been somewhat minor. Sure, if you take the Lone Peak from 10 years ago and compare it to the Lone Peak 9 line differences are immediately apparent, but the changes (perhaps for the best) have been incremental and small, and at times simply cosmetic. That is until now with the new Altra Lone Peak 9+. With my previous Lone Peaks worn down and thinking I might perhaps just be picking up another incremental update with the 9+ – in fact I wasn’t sure if I should pay the premium price over the normal 9, non-plus version – after just a first hike with the 9+ it becomes apparent that this is the biggest and best change to the Lone Peak line since the start. Altra Lone Peak 9+ Design & Features If you’re not familiar with the Lone Peak line it’s a moderately cushioned shoe (featuring a 25mm stack height) that is “zero drop”, meaning that the heel height is the same as the forefoot, with the goal of promoting a more natural stride. The shoe has a wide toebox with plenty of room, and even comes in a wider width if you’re after a particularly wide shoe. The shoe rounds things out with a somewhat aggressive tread and a rockplate, while keeping things lightweight and breathable. Other than that and the “trail rudder” which is a portion of the outsole extending slightly past the heel of the shoe said to help provide additional traction on steep downhills, and along with the gaiter attachment points on the shoe (missing on some previous versions of the Lone Peak but again present on the 9+), what we’ve covered so far rounds out the extras you get with the Lone Peak on top of a pretty standard trail runner. One complaint however has accompanied the Lone Peak in a somewhat common fashion for many years – the traction. While the tread pattern is aggressive and I’ve found it has always offered decent traction when new, after a couple hundred miles the outsole lugs wear down and you do begin to rely on the grip of the rubber itself more so than the tread pattern. That said, it’s something I’ve been cognizant of and for me it’s always been sufficient, or acceptable – it’s not a climbing shoe after all. However opinions vary, and for others the traction of the shoe has been less than satisfactory. For the Lone Peak 9+ Altra partners with Vibram to offer their Lone Peak tread pattern, but made with Vibram rubber. Considering that I’ve always found the traction acceptable but not exemplary I bought the 9+ version (which will cost you about $20 more than standard, resulting in a whopping $160 for a non-waterproof trail running shoe) essentially just so I could stay on top of the latest developments in the Lone Peak line. Lone Peak 9+ Impressions and Performance Fit Fit of the shoe is as you might expect from the Lone Peak – very comfortable with plenty of room for the toes. If the shoe was custom-made for me I’d have the heel made just a bit tighter, but it hasn’t resulted in much nuisance on the trail. While a wide version is offered, the standard version is pretty darn wide. Toes are well protected, you can feel the ground underfoot but the rockplate does its job, stability is just fine, and cushioning is right on – enough where you can just tell it’s helping but without being too soft or raising the stack height up too high for higher angled terrain. The laces are almost comically long – prompting a near mandatory double or triple knot for me. But no matter, once you get moving with the 9+ the grip of the new Vibram sole is immediately apparent and I’ve found it to offer surprising traction on everything from dry trails to wet slickrock. Traction Traction is somewhat reduced by colder temperatures, but overall the traction of the shoe is something to write home about and write about here; the best part for me has been the reduction / near elimination of “microslips” as you hike even on flat ground. It just feels like all your energy is being translated into forward movement, and in my experience descending on something like slickrock your foot just feels “stuck” until you pick it up for the next step. I should note that this is the first Lone Peak where I’ve actually noticed the “trail rudder” extension working when working your way down steep downhills. It’s not a huge deal, but seems to add a little something. In short it’s the same Lone Peak, just better. The Upper To cover the rest of the shoe the mesh is tightly woven and not the most breathable; these do run a bit hot even on days with moderate temperatures. It’s a give and take with this type of thing though as this is a nice to have on a crisper fall day, adds durability, and keeps more debris like sand out. You get Lone Peak fit here in that this is one shoe you won't necessarily be rushing to take off at the end of the day. It's comfortable. If I had to sum up the Lone Peak 9+ in two words, those two words would have to be comfort, and traction. Conclusion The Lone Peak 9+ is one of those rare finds where the hype translates to the trail – the grip is the best I’ve experienced in a trail shoe that results in a feeling of confidence and connection to the ground. It feels like this level of grip even adds in a little efficiency as well; it just feels like 100% of the energy you extend to propel yourself forward is doing just that – moving you along the trail. For me I do wish the heel was a bit tighter on fit, but that will vary by user. The price may be hard to justify however, although it is 2025 I’d be more comfortable spending $160 on something like a waterproof / breathable winter boot. However, when it comes to a breathable trail running shoe and if you’re willing to pay for what you get, the Lone Peak 9+ is hard to beat. You can find the Altra Lone Peak 9+ in both men’s and women’s versions here at REI Co-op. You can also find the shoe at Amazon in the men's version and the women's version. Editor's Note: This review of the Lone Peak 9+ originally appeared in Issue 59 of TrailGroove Magazine. You can read the original article here with additional photos and our rating of this hiking / backpacking / trail running shoe.

Water treatment in the backcountry reminds me of backpacking and hiking footwear just a bit – if you’re not thinking of it when you’re out on the trail, you know you got it right. On the flipside, a water filter or purifier that clogs halfway through a trip will have you baby-sitting a device possibly for hours the rest of the way; a situation to certainly be avoided. In this article we will take a quick look at the best water treatment options currently available. Note that there are many ways to go about treating your water in the backcountry, however for the purposes of this article we’ll stick with mechanical treatment. Boiling and chemical treatment can also be used but is not as common (except for melting snow in winter), and my take is that these methods, other than on winter trips, are best utilized either as a backup or for niche ultralight type scenarios. Caveats stated, on to the article. Best Backpacking & Hiking Water Filters For those that are packing fast and light style and don’t have much time in camp or time for breaks on the trail, and need to only process water for themselves, Katadyn offers their BeFree 1.0 liter system ($45, less than 3 ounces) that offers hollow fiber filtration in a very lightweight, fill-and-drink-as-you-go type of approach and a 1000L rated capacity. This would be a suggested option due to its manufacturer-approved integrity test – which I feel is mandatory on any water filter (it just happens in the backcountry – was that small drop too much...did it freeze?). This same BeFree filtration design has also been utilized in their BeFree 3L gravity system ($80, 7 ounces) and the larger capacity BeFree 6L gravity system ($120, 9 ounces). For more traditional backpacking with time in camp and perhaps a lunch break appreciated, pump or gravity filters come into play including the latter 2 BeFree options above. For my backpacking, I particularly like the Platypus GravityWorks system ($135, 12 ounces) – you can read our GravityWorks review here. This system may be a little cumbersome with all the hoses but offers reliability, plus the ability to hang the dirty water bag and let gravity do the work. I use the 4L system, but for groups a 6L GravityWorks system is available. Platypus also offers their QuickDraw 2L water filtration system ($80, 6 ounces) that is backflushable and integrity-testable. This is a unique setup that you can use multiple ways – connected to plastic bottles, to the included reservoir, etc. – depending on what works best for you. Pump filters like this Hiker Pro have been a go-to for decades and are the classic choice. Traditionally however pump filters have been the backpacker’s choice, and these filters are still relevant today. However, there are the same hoses as a gravity system to deal with and moving parts are introduced along with some associated weight. Cleaning becomes complicated, maintenance is often increased, and there is more to break. If you like to keep it old school here the Katadyn Hiker Pro ($100, 11 ounces) and the MSR MiniWorks EX ($130, 15 ounces) should be considered. However, unfortunately with no integrity test you’ll have to be especially careful in regards to freezing and drops etc. If an inline (with your hydration reservoir) water filter is something you’d like to explore, the MSR Thru-link Water Filter ($55, 3 ounces) is great on price and weight, although you’ll need to do just a little work to integrate into your own setup. However, quick-connects are provided that makes this easier. This filter filters to .2 microns and features activated carbon to improve water taste and quality along with a manufacturer-approved integrity test. Gravity, inline, squeeze-type, or pump….see or our full Backpacking & Hiking Water Treatment Guide for pros and cons and more. Hollow-fiber water filters have come to dominate the backpacking and hiking market and for good reason – they typically offer reliable performance, can typically be backflushed / cleaned, and are very light. For more on how to maintain these filters see our hollow fiber water filter maintenance guide. Summary: Best Backpacking & Hiking Water Filters Katadyn BeFree 1.0 liter Katadyn BeFree 3L gravity system Katadyn BeFree 6L gravity system Platypus GravityWorks 4L Platypus GravityWorks 6L Platypus QuickDraw 2L MSR Thru-link Best Hiking & Backpacking Water Purifiers While you can add in certain methods to your water processing process with a water filter such as an inline carbon element and / or UV treatment, there are times when a water purifier may be a better choice depending on your backpacking destination and your own comfort level. To further treat water, UV devices and / or carbon filters can be added into your water treatment routine if needed. I’ve used several purifiers in the past that utilize electro-adsorption technology and while these products hands down produced some of the best tasting water I can imagine, the cartridges quickly clog. If backpacking, you’ll be buying plenty of cartridges and long trips are tough. Even day hiking and processing typical backcountry water can be difficult. While these types of purifiers may be suitable for travel-type purposes or one-off hiking trips, for more frequent use, they are difficult to use when larger volumes of water need to be processed. Electro-adsorption purifiers have produced the best tasting and cleanest treated water I've ever experienced in the backcountry. They've also been the fastest to clog. For backcountry water purification, and when the best resulting water is desired in an all-in-one type product and something like viruses may be a concern, the MSR Guardian water purifier ($400, 17 ounces) is a go-to choice. You will pay a weight penalty here, as well as a price premium for that matter, but the Guardian is a unique water treatment device – first of all it is a purifier, not a filter – and secondly it can withstand freezing temperatures and drops from up to 6’, both of which are quite unique. Additionally, it has a self-cleaning design and can output up to 2.5L a minute. There is no carbon in this purifier. That said, if you prefer the more laid-back, gravity-style approach, MSR now also offers a Guardian Gravity water purifier ($310, 18 ounces). While sharing the name of the Guardian pump system, this cartridge is a bit different – it’s not rated for freezing or drops, but MSR does detail an integrity test you can perform on it if you’re not sure. It also differs in that a carbon stage is included to further polish your water. Output will also be slower and in the .5L / minute range, so make sure you have a little time…but if you’re like me, kicking your feet up while gravity does the work is not a bad way to go about it. Summary: Best Hiking and Backpacking Water Purifiers MSR Guardian Pump Water Purifier MSR Guardian Gravity Water Purifier Conclusion Every destination is different in regards to water quality, and this is one of the first things to do when it comes to planning for an upcoming trip. If your destinations are all higher mountain destinations and you are picky about where you get your water, it’s possible that one product can cover all your water treatment needs. That said, if your adventures take you from the desert to the mountains and everything in between, it’s likely you’ll either collect another product or two over the years and / or add-in methods to further process the water you’ll drink. In the end, there are a lot of tools in the toolbox and when it comes to your backcountry drinking water, it’s best to use the right tool for the job at hand. For more background on water treatment methods, what we need to treat for, and water treatment strategy, see our Backpacking and Hiking Water Treatment Guide. You can also find a list of available water filters and purifiers here at REI Co-op.

Issue 60 of TrailGroove Magazine is now available! Click the preceding link or the cover below to take a look: In This Issue: Jargon: C0, C6, C8 DWR Trail News Trail Tip: Adding a Foam Pad Waterfalls of Tennessee & Kentucky Hiking Arches and Canyonlands Nitecore NU25 MCT Headlamp Review Mountain House Cajun Style Jambalaya Review Hiking the Sky Islands of Southern Arizona 112 pages dedicated to backpacking and hiking. Special thanks to all of our readers and contributors @Steve Ancik, @Susan Dragoo, @Amanda Klemp, & Jon Klemp for your support and contributions towards the latest issue! If it's your first time viewing the magazine, we suggest starting on Page 1 for online viewing tips and tricks. Prefer to view the magazine in high definition or save it and view it offline? Our HD PDF is also available individually or included with a Premium Membership. Your input is highly appreciated. Let us know what you thought about Issue 59 here on the TrailGroove Forum, or contact us anytime. Thanks for reading!

Hi Colby and welcome to Trailgroove. I have not been to Sante Fe, NM for a couple of decades. I was last there for my father's 2nd marriage at his friend's home, the late Lee Elliot Berk, the former president of Burklee school of music. The city was truly breathtaking, and I have not had a decent Tex-Mex Fajitas meal ever since. Glad to have you aboard.

Great photos Carl, and welcome to Trailgroove.

Finding the perfect clothing to hike in can be a challenge, particularly if your body doesn't work well wearing unisex clothing. In the past there were not many women's-specific clothing items created for hiking and backpacking. Luckily more manufacturers are designing and selling clothes made for women and their specific needs, and many are providing extended sizing to accommodate more of us. Here are some favorite items that are made specifically for women, although individual preferences and requirements vary. Best Women's Hiking Pants Most of the time, I prefer to hike in long pants, as I tend to be off-trail often and wish to avoid scratches and scrapes on my legs. Also, having long pants helps avoid mosquito-bites and sunburn in the summer. The pants listed below all have been tested on the trail, but since we all have unique shapes and preferences, be sure to try these on before heading out for a long hike. The Outdoor Research Ferrosi Pants ($110) are very comfortable and lightweight with a decent amount of stretch. The fabric is so light, that I can wear it on the hottest days without any issue of overheating, and they dry very quickly. Surprisingly, the material is quite durable for being so thin. These are mid-rise pants and do tend to run large - luckily the drawstring around the waist can help to adjust them further. There are drawstrings around the leg cuffs also, which is great for modifying fit, but I've also found myself stepping on them at times. Overall, these pants are so comfortable, that I keep going back to them despite the other pairs of pants I have. Extended sizing from 0 to 24W (some petite & tall also available). If you prefer convertible pants, the REI Sahara Convertible Pants ($89.85) are a good bet. They zip off just above the knee to become shorts on those hotter hiking days. There are also zippers that run up the outside of the leg from the foot to the shorts, so you can partially unzip for ventilation or unzip completely and convert to shorts without taking off your shoes/boots. These are mid-rise pants, and are quick drying and treated with DWR to resist water as well. Keep in mind, the zippered areas will have less stretch, so be sure they are comfortable for you before taking them on a trip particularly if (like me) you have thicker thighs. Sizes 0 to 26W, with tall and petite up to size 16. For versatile pants that work great on the trail as well as around town, check out Prana Halle Pants ($95). These are boot-cut and low-rise, and have 2 buttons at the waist along with a drawstring. The material is a bit thicker and less breathable than the ones above, so keep the conditions in mind when you look at these pants. I like to wear them on shoulder-season hikes for this reason, but on the other hand they are very durable and well-made. They are treated to be water repellent and UPF50+. Prana also offers the Stretch Zion Halle Pants, which are straight-legged and mid-rise with a slightly lighter but similar fabric. Both come in sizes 00 to 16. A well-known name in outdoor clothing, Columbia offers several hiking pant options including the Leslie Falls Convertible Pants ($85). These pants are made with UPF50 fabric with Omni-Shield to be repellent to rain and stains. They convert to shorts with zippers above the knees, and they also convert to capris by rolling up the cuffs and securing with snaps on each leg. They are available in short, regular, and long inseams in sizes 2-18, as well as 16W to 24W and are slim-fitting in the hips and thighs, so you may consider sizing up if you'd like a looser fit. Best Women's Hiking Skorts / Skirts If you prefer hiking in a skirt, a proven favorite is the Purple Rain Adventure Skirt ($79.99) which is designed by a hiker specifically for the trail, although it looks great off the trail too. It is synthetic and water resistant (PFAS-free DWR), with pockets and a comfortable waistband for under your hip belt. Sizes XS to 3XL. If you prefer skorts, the Prana Koen Skort ($74) is a great choice. The Koen Skort has a thick and comfortable waistband that doesn't roll and can be cinched for better fit. It is made of a lightweight, quick-drying material and can be made shorter by cinching up the sides. The shorts are quite comfortable for hiking, not too tight and not too short. Sizes XS to XXL. Best Women's Hiking Shirts There are so many variations of shirts to wear on the trail, and I often switch things up depending on the location and weather conditions of my hikes. Also, many of these shirts allow for layering, which is the best way to account for changing conditions. Here are some items I've found that work well. T-Shirts The Patagonia Capilene Cool Daily Shirt ($49) is a short sleeved, synthetic, moisture-wicking, and fast-drying t-shirt that comes in several colors and with graphic tee options as well. This is a good basic t-shirt that is comfortable with a little stretch, and it will work well under other shirts or on its own. Sizes XXS to XXL. For wool the Woolverino Microweight 145 Women's Wool V-Neck ($69.99) is a lightweight tee made with a merino wool blend (84% Merino Wool, 12% Nylon, 4% Spandex). It has raglan sleeves for comfort, and is long enough to fit under backpack hip belts. Although a great shirt, be careful to avoid snags and significant abrasion. It is machine washable and UPF20. Sizes XS to 2X. Our own TrailGroove synthetic Performance Shirt is also a go-to of mine on warmer hikes and serving as a baselayer in other conditions. The more relaxed fit allows for comfort and breathability and being 100% synthetic, it dries extremely fast. An affordable and versatile option is the Under Armour Women’s Tech Twist Short Sleeve V-Neck ($25). This synthetic t-shirt also comes in a crew neck and in many colors. It is a very lightweight shirt that can be used for running, hiking, or any other workout as it is sweat-wicking and quick-drying. Friendly note: the lighter colors can be slightly transparent. Sizes XS to 3X. Tank Tops The REI Co-op Sahara Shade Tank Top ($34.95) is a UPF 50+ sleeveless top that is perfect for hiking in hot conditions. It has a higher neck and is long enough to fit below hip belts. As with most of our options, it is quick drying and comes in a large range of sizes. Be sure to protect those shoulders if you'll be in the sun, though! Sizes XS to 3X. A tank version of the Woolverino tee above – the Woolverino Women's Racerback Tank Top ($59.99) – has the same breathable, lightweight wool blend as the tee, but in a sleeveless racerback. This shirt has less coverage than the REI tank above, and is machine washable. Again, handle with care and watch for snags. Sizes XS to 3X. Long Sleeve Sun Protection When you need extra sun protection, check out the Outdoor Research Echo Long Sleeve Shirt ($65). It has raglan sleeves and flat seams to allow easy movement with comfort. It is made of a very lightweight, stretchy, and extremely breathable fabric – so much that it can be see-through. The Echo shirt can be used as a base layer for all 4 seasons as well and is UPF 15. Previous versions had roll down cuffs to cover hands, and I’m hoping OR will consider adding that back to newer versions. Sizes XXS to XXL. For a more traditional, collared shirt, the Columbia PFG Tamiami II Long-Sleeve Women's Shirt ($60) is a classic choice. It has snaps instead of buttons, and is a very lightweight shirt with UPF40 protection. This shirt is easy to layer with a tank or t-shirt underneath. It has a vented back, zippered side pockets and roll-up sleeves. Sizes XS to 3X. For ultimate sun-protection, especially on the back of your neck, a hooded shirt is a great option. The Mountain Hardwear Crater Lake Long-Sleeve Hoody ($79) is UPF50+ and made of a lightweight, "solar knit jersey" with flat seam construction for comfort. There is a drawcord at the hem to shorten if needed, and it has thumbholes that allow extra coverage over hands. There is one small zippered pocket for valuables on the side. Wear with a baseball cap (see the TrailGroove Store) or trucker hat to provide more coverage. Sizes XS to 3X. Best Women's Outerwear (Rain Gear, Insulated Jackets) When hiking on overnight and longer trips, carrying the right outerwear allows you to be prepared for any weather situation. It's important to pay attention to current conditions as well as forecasts, but sometimes a storm will surprise you even with the most pleasant hiking forecast. When backpacking in the warmer months, I stick to ultralight items as they spend most of their time in my backpack, but I do need them to be dependable for the few times I do need them. Typically, this includes a rain jacket and rain pants (stored where I can access them quickly) and an insulated jacket for warmth. During colder trips, I will layer these items and sometimes add more specialized winter clothing. One ultralight women's rain jacket is the Marmot Women's Superalloy Bio Rain Jacket ($185) which is quite lightweight and listed as 5 oz, although mine is slightly higher at 5.75 oz. This jacket has a zippered chest pocket which can be used as a stuff sack for easy packing. It is made with Marmot's NanoPro breathable fabric membrane and taped seams, being both waterproof and windproof. Sizes XS to XL. Zpacks offers the Women's Vertice Rain Jacket ($299) which weighs just 5.1 oz. It is made with their Vertice Waterproof Breathable Fabric and has fully taped seams. This jacket runs a little long for full rain protection and ease of use with a backpack. There is a visor in the hood that adjusts vertically with a strap on the back of the hood, and a zippered chest pocket that doubles as a stuff sack. There are waterproof armpit zippers for ventilation. Sizes XS to XL. The Zpacks Women's Vertice Rain Pants are similarly made with the Vertice Waterproof Breathable Fabric and weigh just 2.5 oz. These pants come in sizes S to XXL. For warmth, I carry a packable down jacket which I store protected in my pack to keep from getting wet. Some may prefer a synthetic jacket instead of down, which will also work well, but may not pack as small and will likely weigh a bit more. My go-to is the Montbell Alpine Light Down Parka ($285). It is quite warm for its weight (12.8 oz) and made with 800 Fill Power EX down. The Alpine Light has some thoughtful features, such as an adjustable hood for a close fit and zip end guards to protect your face/chin from getting poked by the end of the zipper (I wish all jackets had this). One thing to note...the jackets listed above only go to up women's size XL. So, if you are in need of a larger size in this type of clothing, the men's sizes go up to XXL which will give larger chest and hip/waist measurements, but also longer sleeves. That said, the REI Co-op Women's Magma Down Hoodie offers a more budget-friendly option here that goes up to 3X in women's sizing. There are many other options for rain jackets in extended sizes, but they have a tradeoff in being much heavier materials. One exception might be the Frogg Toggs Women's Xtreme Lite Hooded Jacket ($69.99) which comes in sizes S through 2XL. Best Women’s Backpacking / Hiking Base Layers The perfect base layers are essential for backpacking trips with cooler overnight temperatures or when hiking in very cold conditions. The base layers can also serve as comfortable (and clean) pajamas to keep your sleeping bag clean. There are many options, but remember you want to have breathable and moisture-wicking clothes in case you have to wear them while hiking. Also, the lighter the better in many cases, if you'll be carrying them on your back much of the time. Made with a breathable fabric, the REI Co-op Lightweight Half-Zip Base Layer Top and Tights are a dependable choice. $49.95 (top) & $44.95 (tights). These all-synthetic pieces (92% recycled polyester) are also UPF50+, and the top is high-neck and half-zip for warmth but with the flexibility to unzip and cool down a bit. The top also has underarm gussets, and both top and bottoms have flat seams. Both pieces are offered in sizes XS-3X, and the tights have Petite sizing options. The top weighs 5.7 oz, and the tights weigh 4.3 oz. For a more natural fabric, there is the Smartwool Classic Thermal Merino Base Layer Crew & Bottom ($125 each) which come in sizes XS-4X and in several colors and patterns. These are made from 100% merino wool, which has the natural benefits of temperature regulation and odor resistance. The top also comes in quarter-zip. 7.69 oz top. 7.3 oz bottom. Best Women’s Hiking Underwear Underwear choices are so individual, not just because of preferences, but also because of our unique bodies. The suggestions below will not work for everyone, and again, make sure what you have fits well and is comfortable before heading out on a trip. No one wants underclothes that itch, bunch, or slide around when you're trying to enjoy a hike. The REI Co-op Active Bikini Underwear ($19.95) are a good synthetic choice. They are made of fast-drying and moisture-wicking fabric and are not super tight. I have a pair that has lasted several years with very little sign of wear. These are so lightweight that it's easy to throw an extra pair or two in your pack. Sizes XS to 3X. The Woolly Women's Bikini Brief ($34) is made of natural fibers and also comes in hipster, thong, and high-waisted options. The merino wool is blended with 5% elastane, and may stretch quite a lot after a while of hiking. Again, make sure the fit is right and that it's comfortable for you. Sizes X-Small to XX-Large. Sports Bras for Hiking Regarding bras, it is best to pick one that fits you well, doesn't cause friction with your backpack, and doesn't slip while hiking. Some women go very light with a bralette, while others prefer (or require) more support even including underwire and thick padding. My preferences have tended to be in the middle. One example is the Beyond Yoga Spacedye Lift Your Spirits Bra ($66); it is a moisture-wicking sports bra with removable pads. It provides light to medium support and comes in sizes XX-Small to 4X. For lighter coverage, there is the Branwyn Essential Bralette ($52), which has no underwire or padding, but is a seamless merino blend. This bralette has the benefits of merino that make it a good choice for sweaty hikes. The "gentle support" is comfortable, but may not work for women who require more support / prefer more coverage while hiking. It has convertible straps, which can be used to make it a crossback bra to help avoid chafing. Comes in sizes XS to XXL. Branwyn also makes the Essential Busty Bra ($62) with a thicker band, larger cups, and slightly wider (still convertible) straps, but is still lightweight without padding or underwire. For a bra with more support, there is the Under Armour Infinity Mid Impact Sports Bra ($40). It has injection-molded pads (not removable) that feel very light along with a sweat-wicking band. There is a hook and eye closure in the back for easy on/off, and the straps can be worn straight or crossback by detaching at the front. There are small mesh panels on the sides to provide extra ventilation. Available in sizes XS to XL, in 2 options (A-C cup, D-DD cup), and also available in plus sizes 1X-3X. While this guide should get you started, it all comes down to what clothing works best for you on the trail and in the conditions you expect to encounter. Conclusion Hopefully these suggestions help you get on the trail with clothes that don’t just work but work and fit well. In addition to the suggestions above, be sure to check out REI Co-op clearance sales in the Outlet for highly-rated backpacking and hiking gear for a discounted price.

As one of the most important decisions you can make when it comes to backpacking gear, your choice of a backpacking tent can have quite the impact in regards to your comfort in camp and protection from the elements. Additionally, choosing the best backpacking tent can also have an impact when it comes to weight carried on the trail (as one of, if not the heaviest items in your pack), and a tent decision can have quite the impact on your wallet, as well. With many factors to consider, in this article we’ll look at the top backpacking tents currently on the market, with a preference towards tents that of course offer protection from the elements, but also are lightweight and include plenty of space for the weight (including headroom), while remaining sufficiently durable and easy to use. Additionally preference here leans towards tents that haven’t had any flame or fire retardant chemicals applied, and for tents that are easy to get in and out of and have space to store gear. Best Solo & Ultralight Backpacking Tents For solo use I look to save just about as much weight as possible and space is less of a concern – I find a little extra space to be much more useful and important when there’s more than one person sharing a tent. If it’s just me and in this day and age, I’ll look to go with a Dyneema Composite Fabric tent every time and will look for an ultralight tent under the 20 ounce mark or so. Previously my choice has been the (discontinued) Zpacks Hexamid Twin, which while designed for two was much more workable for one person having only a single side door and one vestibule. This tent however still only weighed around a pound. An ultralight Dyneema Composite Fabric tent from Zpacks Luckily there are modern-day alternatives available from Zpacks via their Plex Solo tent ($599, 14.5 oz.) as well as their Altaplex Solo tent ($699, 16.5 oz.), with the Altaplex being designed for taller hikers. I like a rectangular, non-tapering floorplan whenever I can get it no matter what tent I’m looking at, and as such the Altaplex would be an intriguing ultralight option. That said for those using standard-width pads who want the lightest pack, the Plex Solo and the Plex Solo Lite tent (a Plex Solo tent option featuring more ultralight materials and further weight savings) are equally interesting choices. With the solo tent category one door and one vestibule work great, as can be found in the tent designs discussed above. However, especially for those that backpack with a wide pad and like space, the Duplex Lite tent ($699, 14.9 oz.) should be given strong consideration. The Duplex Lite is also an option for 2 with standard-width pads, who want to save as much weight as possible and don’t mind bumping elbows. Regardless of which Zpacks tent you go with, I’d suggest at least considering their .75 oz. canopy material over the default .55 oz. Dyneema. I’ve used the .55 oz. material for years without issue – it’s not a bad default material and my tents have withstood years of use and severe weather. However, future DCF tents that I purchase will likely be of the .75 oz. variety just for all-around insurance. The .75 oz. material will be stronger and offer greater puncture resistance, which may be appreciated over the long haul and when you need it, without too much of a weight penalty. As you might have guessed, Zpacks offering buyers the choice of this fabric option is one reason their tents are recommended so highly in this article. Note that as you might expect, their "Lite" tents are not offered in this heavier duty fabric, but are still worth consideration as the lightest of the light. However, if you’re not sold on Dyneema and prefer a more traditionally-designed tent, one that does stand out in this category can be found in the NEMO Hornet Elite Osmo 1-Person tent ($600, 29 oz.). With 39” of headroom this tent may not be the most ideal choice for the tallest of users, but this height is on par with other tents in the more traditional, double-walled and freestanding (or semi-freestanding) tent market. At less than 2 pounds this tent will not weigh you down and can even fit a rectangular large and wide sleeping pad. If you’re looking to save some cash, NEMO also offers a standard version of the Hornet Osmo, which still comes in at a respectable weight with slightly smaller interior dimensions. Summary: Best Solo & Ultralight Tents Zpacks Plex Solo Standard Zpacks Altaplex Classic Zpacks Plex Solo Lite Zpacks Duplex Lite NEMO Hornet Osmo Elite NEMO Hornet Osmo Standard In summary if you’re looking for a Dyneema Composite Fabric (DCF) ultralight or solo tent and are open to a non-traditional design, Zpacks offers an excellent choice of floorplans and overall performance, and with the option of a heavier-duty DCF fabric for durability. For a more traditional design but still in the ultralight category, take a look at the NEMO Osmo series. Best 2-Person Backpacking Tents For a 2-person backpacking tent, I look for 2 doors with side entries and 2 matching vestibules, without question. This allows each person their own entry and exit (no having to crawl over anyone) and their own space to store gear at night. Generally, around 3lbs. or less is a good target here. For many years my go-to option here was the Six Moon Designs Lunar Duo ($395, 45 oz.). This tent features all the prerequisites above, but the weight of their lighter backpacking model (previously known as the Explorer model, and suggested if budget allows over their heavier Lunar Duo Outfitter) has crept up a bit in recent years. The Six Moon Designs Lunar Duo 2-person backpacking tent That said, the Lunar Duo backpacking model is not exactly heavy by any means and is a wonderful design with a 54x90” floorplan. This is one of the best floor measurements for a 2-person tent I’ve ever used. It’s long enough for tall hikers, wide enough for 2 wide pads, and isn’t excessive even with 2 standard pads…extra space is always nice. Additionally, the 45” centered height is great for sitting up in the tent. If at least one hiker uses a shorter pad, you can easily fit 2 people plus a dog or very small child in this tent as well, with gear being stored in the large vestibules. Find our Lunar Duo review here. About the only downside to this tent is that, as with all silnylon / silpoly tents including those to follow from Tarptent, you’ll need to seal the seams with something like SeamGrip SIL seam sealer at home before you head out, although many manufacturers are now offering this as an add-on service. Many backpackers – including myself – have long hoped that Six Moon Designs would come out with a Dyneema Lunar Duo to take things from lightweight to ultralight...we’ll continue to keep our hopes up. With its 90" long floor, the Lunar Duo from Six Moon Designs can fit 2 people with extra room, especially if at least one person utilizes a shorter sleeping pad. For something lighter but significantly more expensive, the Zpacks Duplex tent ($749, 17.9 oz.) or the larger Zpacks Triplex Pro tent ($899, 22 oz.) are worth significant consideration. Zpacks tents are made from Dyneema Composite Fabric to save weight and you’ll end up with a tent that won’t sag in the rain like you can get with silnylon. At a 45” floor width, the Duplex will be tight for 2 people and both hikers will have to use standard-width sleeping pads, unless you want to absolutely max out the width of the floor with 1 wide and 1 regular-width sleeping pad…something I don’t recommend. The Triplex Pro however, at a 65” floor width could work for up to 3, but also has plenty of room for 2 people with wide pads and room for gear for those who like plenty of space. Utilizing standard-width sleeping pads with the Triplex Pro can get you a 2+ person tent with room for a child or a dog for example, however for my use case the original Triplex (with a 60x90" floorplan – our Triplex review) was more versatile as a 2+ tent and offered more room for taller users. For a 2+ person tent that will fit wide pads, the LightHeart Gear Duo Tent ($340, 36 oz.) with its unique 55x100" floorplan is also worth a look and the longer floor makes fitting a dog in much easier. The Zpacks Triplex offers room for 2 people using wide sleeping pads with room to spare. Mainstream manufacturer Big Agnes makes some interesting tents in their Platinum and Carbon lines that are either freestanding or semi-freestanding, however there are some compromises to be had related to interior space or entry configuration (a side door, even when solo, is preferred). For example the Tiger Wall 2 Platinum tent ($700, 39 oz.) will get you a semi-freestanding tent for 2 using standard-width pads, but the 86” length and 39” peak height combined with a lengthwise sloping ceiling would be cramped for taller users. In this category the Lunar Duo would be the closest tent to being a perfect fit for 2. That said, we’re not making a custom tent here and beggars can’t be choosers. For two using wide pads who also have a dog along, the aforementioned LightHeart Duo would be a better fit with the Zpacks Triplex Pro working for niche situations for 2 with standard-length wide pads who like room and gear (or maybe a dog) in the tent. These tents feature 2 doors and 2 vestibules. Summary: Best 2-Person Backpacking Tents Six Moon Designs Lunar Duo Six Moon Designs Lunar Duo Outfitter Zpacks Duplex Zpacks Triplex Pro LightHeart Gear Duo Big Agnes Tiger Wall 2 Platinum To summarize, the Zpacks Duplex would be more of an ultralight option for 2 with standard pads, while the LightHeart Duo or Zpacks Triplex Pro allows for maximum comfort / room for a dog or gear. The venerable Six Moon Designs Lunar Duo series offers a budget-friendly option with a perfect floor size for two. For a more traditional design, the Big Agnes Platinum tent is worth consideration. Best Family or Group Backpacking Tents There is not much discussion to be had here when it comes to the best group and family backpacking tent, as unfortunately it seems manufacturers pour most of their research and development into their 1 or 2-person tent designs. The Tarptent Hogback ($549, 63.2 oz.) is my choice in this category with few competitors. The Hogback is a 4-person tent that weighs in around 4 pounds and features an 86x86” floorplan that can fit up to 4 standard-width pads, or 3 wide pads, and features double-wall construction with either mesh or partial-solid fabric inner options. 4 people in the Hogback will be a squeeze and you’ll be fighting for vestibule space, but we’ve used it for 3 plus a dog on many occasions. Tarptent Hogback 4-person backpacking tent Although for years Tarptent declined to entertain the idea of making Dyneema Composite Fabric tents, in recent years they began to utilize this weight-saving non-stretch fabric, but it hasn’t made it up the line to the Hogback quite yet (which would save quite a bit of weight in a tent this large). That said, we’ve been quite happy with the silnylon fly utilized in our Hogback and about 4lbs is still quite light for a tent of this size. You can read our full Tarptent Hogback review here. Although more of a backpacking shelter than a tent due to its floorless nature, the Black Diamond Mega Light tent ($500, 45 oz.) is also worth considering in this category and these tents and tents of a similar design have been successfully used by educational expeditions for many years. Depending on where you’re backpacking however, the extra bug and weather protection you get with an integrated floor like you’ll find on the Hogback may be appreciated. There is an optional nest available for the Mega Light; however it more than doubles the weight and almost doubles the price. For a lighter option Hyperlite Mountain Gear offers their UltaMid 4 pyramid ($1440 as a tent, 62 oz. with the floored mesh insert and pole). With either of these shelters you'll need to be aware of some compromises pyramid shelters can have – like a pole in the center of the tent, slanted walls, typically one (relatively) small door for entry and exit, lack of vestibule space, and the possibility of rain getting into the tent when entering and exiting due to the slanted walls. For freestanding options, the Copper Spur UL4 tent ($850, 88 oz.), with its larger (listed) 86x96” floorplan can fit 4 people with a couple of those people using wide pads, and this tent also has an impressive 50” inside height. In our testing getting this tent's floorplan to measure up to specs would be quite a stretch; thus we cannot recommend this tent maxed out with 3X wide pads along with 1 standard-width pad. That said the tent will fit 4 people all in the same tent, although you’ll be well over 5lbs. And if the UL4 still isn’t enough space, you can take a look at the 86x108” Copper Spur HV UL5 ($950, 117 oz.) which, as you might expect, is designed for groups of 5 and features 60” – or 5 feet, of headroom. The Copper Spur UL line is typically a leader on the spec sheets – just be aware that to achieve light weight in a traditional design Big Agnes uses very light 15 and 20D fabrics that are lower on the hydrostatic head scale and feature a PU (polyurethane) coating. Coatings are very waterproof and allow manufacturers to tape seams, but coatings wear off, unlike impregnated silicone or Dyneema waterproof fabrics (it would be suggested to use a groundsheet – I use one made of window insulation film). The recently updated and aforementioned Zpacks Triplex Pro with its 65x84” floorplan would work for 3 average sized people with standard length / regular width pads who aren’t too tall – and is about as light as you could get for this use case, but may be a bit short for taller users. At some point and once the group size gets larger, taking multiple smaller separate tents may make the most sense and can even save weight over a single larger tent – although depending on your tent choice, this can potentially be more expensive. Summary: Best Family or Group Backpacking Tents Tarptent Hogback Black Diamond Mega Light HMG UltaMid 4 Big Agnes Copper Spur UL4 Big Agnes Copper Spur HV UL5 Zpacks Triplex Pro For family and group tents the Tarptent Hogback is our choice, if your group will fit. The struts allow for good use of the 86x86” floorplan, but 86x86” is tight as group size approaches 4. The Black Diamond Mega Light and HMG UltaMid4 are pyramid options, which again are great if you fit and if you can deal with the drawbacks of the pyramid design, including inefficient use of floorspace. For more traditional designs, the Copper Spur series should be considered, however care will need to be exercised with the ultralight fabrics utilized. For 3 looking for the lightest possible solution, look no further than the Zpacks Triplex Pro. Best Budget Backpacking Tents Budget is relative, but for this category we can go ahead and rule out ultralight Dyneema tents and set our focus on the much more affordable nylon and polyester options. The Six Moon Designs Lunar Solo ($260, 26 oz.) can be had for less with free shipping and a sign-up discount, and if you catch it on sale it can even go for under $200. The Lunar Solo is roomy for one, fitting either standard or wide pads. The REI Co-op Half Dome Series of tents with a 2-person as well as a 3-person option has also been a go-to choice for many years. The REI Co-op Flash Series of tents offer lighter weight options, and can typically be found on sale at intervals throughout the year. The venerable Six Moon Designs Lunar Duo can also be found in their heavier but much cheaper polyester Outfitter Tent version, which will get you a palace for 2 people in a package under 4lbs. for around $200. If you’re looking to save and aren’t too picky on an exact model, checking the REI Co-op Outlet from time to time can lead to some good savings on a variety of tent models from various manufacturers. Summary: Best Budget Backpacking Tents Six Moon Designs Lunar Solo REI Co-op Half Dome Series REI Co-op Flash Series Lunar Duo Outfitter REI Co-op Outlet Tents If you’re looking to save some cash but still want a great tent, the SMD Lunar Solo is a venerable choice in this category for solo use. For two, look to the Lunar Duo Outfitter also from Six Moon Designs. The REI Co-op Half Dome series make for a traditional choice, with the REI Co-op Flash series offering some weight savings, and it’s always worth browsing the REI Co-op Outlet to see what’s on sale. Best 4-Season Backpacking Tents All the tents listed here thus far are primarily targeted towards 3-season use, but if you’re wanting to extend your trips into winter where heavy snow load can be expected and freestanding features become more important, you’ll need to look into 4-season options. The Black Diamond Firstlight 2P ($550, 54 oz.) has been a popular option for solo and 2-person use for years – you can find our full review of the Firstlight 2P tent here. If you like the Firstlight but want a little more space for 2 people, look at the Black Diamond Firstlight 3P ($600, 64 oz.). Tarptent Scarp 2 4-season tent For my use, I like the Tarptent Scarp 2 ($400, 56 oz.), however the weight is getting up there with the crossing poles and you’ll need to set a couple snow anchors with this one. For more, take a look at our Tarptent Scarp 2 review. When it comes to 4-season tents and winter backpacking, you don't want to make any compromises in regards to protection from the elements or the sturdiness of your tent, and extra weight carried here is typically worth it. Summary: Best 4-Season Backpacking Tents Black Diamond Firstlight 2P Black Diamond Firstlight 3P Tarptent Scarp 2 For winter and 4-season usage the Scarp 2 from Tarptent is my choice, be it a solo or 2-person trip. However and as you might expect, Black Diamond has plenty of choices in this category that are among the most popular 4-season tents of all time. Final Thoughts Overall when selecting the best backpacking tent you need to find a balance between weather and bug protection, weight, space, and price – and getting that balance just right will be a little different for each of us. However, with hundreds of options on the market the perfect tent is likely out there for everyone no matter your needs. For more on baseline information and factors to consider when choosing a backpacking tent or shelter, see our guide on how to choose a backpacking tent that goes into tent design and factors to consider on a more overall and general level. For a list of additional backpacking tents to consider from various manufacturers that you can narrow down by capacity, season, and more, check out this page at REI.com.

Finding a great backpacking sleeping pad is the next logical step in getting your backpacking gear all set once you’ve decided on the big 3 (tent, sleeping bag, backpack). The sleeping pad rounds out what’s known as the big 4 in backpacking – and this list makes up some of the most important gear you’ll carry, with these items typically also including the most expensive items you need to purchase and also representing the items where you can save the most weight. In this guide, we’ll look at the best backpacking sleeping pads that you can find on the market today. Note that in this guide, we’ll list the specs for the regular size if possible (generally 72x20 inches) and list the r-value as well – the higher the value the warmer the pad. Best Summer & Ultralight Backpacking Sleeping Pads For those that are looking to focus on a summer season specific sleeping pad and / or are looking for an ultralight solution for warmer seasons, there are a few standout choices on the market that weigh less than a pound. First, if you’re a backpacker just looking for set and forget type reliability and if you’re the type of sleeper that can find comfort in just about any flat place, the venerable closed cell foam sleeping pad could work, and will save some cash as well. The Therm-a-Rest Z Lite SOL (14 ounces, $60, 2.0 r-value), is a folding foam pad that makes packing easier (but as a foam pad, still bulky). This pad is a little light on the r-value, but would be sufficient for summer trips with moderate lows well above freezing. The NEMO Switchback folding pad (15 ounces, $60, 2.0 r-value) is a competing option in this regard and worth equal consideration. For more, see our review of the NEMO Switchback. These foam pads are also great as a sit pad outside the tent and on breaks during the hiking day. Most backpackers will want more sleeping comfort than a foam pad can offer however. For the lightest of the ultralight insulated inflatable sleeping pads, look no further than to the NEMO Tensor Elite (9 ounces, $250, 2.4 r-value). This new for 2025 pad will offer warmth for summer trips above freezing for most people and offers inflatable comfort, albeit in a mummy shape – this pad is all about saving weight. It should be noted that this pad utilizes 10 denier shell fabrics; extra care will need to be exercised. NEMO also offers their Tensor Trail Ultralight (14 ounces, $190, 2.8 r-value) that doesn’t quite have the warmth to weight of some of their other pads that we’ll discuss later, but this pad is a bit lighter and makes this category. The NEMO valve system allows for easy inflation, deflation, and fine-tuning of comfort level. Exped has offered some of our favorite sleeping pads over the years, and in this category they offer their 1R and 3R pads, with both coming in either mummy or rectangular designs. The Exped Ultra 1R mummy sleeping pad (11 ounces, $120, 1.3 r-value) isn’t insulated, and with this low of an r-value this will only be suitable for the warmest of summer trips. Ever since the Synmat series, Exped has offered value and all-around sleeping pad performance. To me, the Exped Ultra 3R insulated pad (13 ounces, 2.9 r-value, $140) is a much more interesting pad. I’ve taken predecessors of this pad down to freezing or just a bit below, and lower than that combined with a thin ultralight foam pad (1/8" CCF foam). Again, Exped makes a rectangular 3R as well, but at a pound we are perhaps delving into the category to follow. I've found that quilted construction in a sleeping pad (as seen above), or vertical baffles (baffles running head to toe) are the most comfortable and help to keep you on the pad. With a wide enough sleeping pad it's not a deal breaker. However for me the leader in this category would be the Therm-a-Rest NeoAir XLite NXT (13 ounces, $210, 4.5 r-value) and this is an interesting pad because it’s also a leader in our next category as well. This pad has the ultralight weight that puts it in this category, and with the 4.5 r-value you likely won’t need to worry about warmth on summer trips. Looking for an ultralight pad for fast and light summer trips but that also packs warmth for the shoulder seasons? It’s a tall task to beat this pad for that type of use case. Summary: Best Summer & Ultralight Backpacking Sleeping Pads Therm-a-Rest Z Lite SOL NEMO Switchback NEMO Tensor Elite NEMO Tensor Trail Ultralight Exped Ultra 1R Exped Ultra 3R Therm-a-Rest NeoAir XLite NXT Best 3-Season and All-Around Sleeping Pads This is your all-around, bread and butter sleeping pad category. While weights may not be the most ultralight due to the needed increase of r-value for 3-season and shoulder season temperatures, recent advances in sleeping pad technology (it all started with the original Therm-a-Rest NeoAir) have allowed for some very intriguing options to hit the market. Weights here are generally around a pound or just a little more, with insulation that should be good to freezing or a bit below. Choices in this category can be quickly narrowed down to just a few options. The best options include the NEMO Tensor All Season sleeping pad (around $220, 1lb) which is an excellent choice for 3-season use where warmth is appreciated, but it still might get chilly to below freezing at night with a possible cold snap taking things down to the 20s or below, or for cold sleepers any time of the year. With a 5.4 r-value and a rectangular sleeping shape, this pad has a warmth to weight to sleeping and packing space ratio that would have seemed impossible a decade ago. The NEMO Tensor All Season is my pick as the top overall sleeping pad currently on the market. For those looking to save more weight, the Therm-a-Rest NeoAir XLite NXT ($210, 13 ounces in the regular mummy, 4.5 r-value) again gets the weight down to an even more ultralight level with sufficient warmth for 3-season trips, and will save some space in the tent and pack if needed. This pad is also available in a rectangular shape – the NeoAir NXT MAX, which would be my choice if going with the NeoAir in this category, for the additional comfort. While the NeoAir line comes with an inflation bag that works well, it’s unfortunately not adequate to utilize as a dry sack for gear, as can be found in the Exped Schnozzel. That said it is included, and any inflatable pad these days should come with some type of inflation bag / solution. Inflation bag included with NEMO sleeping pads The great thing about these two pads is that they are light enough to be very justifiable for summer trips, have the warmth needed for shoulder season use, and can even be used for winter backpacking if you add in a foam pad to your system to boost the total r-value. New for 2026, Exped has released their Ultra 6.5R sleeping pad line (16 ounces, $200, 6.9 r-value) which takes their venerable synthetically-insulated sleeping pads and also adds in reflective foil to boost warmth. If you want to sleep warm and are looking for a lightweight, but perhaps not ultralight sleeping pad, this would be a sleeping pad line to strongly consider. While at a 6.9 r-value this line will work in the next section as well, the weight specs do put this line in the all-around category. Summary: Best 3-Season and All-Around Sleeping Pads NEMO Tensor All Season Therm-a-Rest NeoAir XLite NXT Therm-a-Rest NeoAir NXT MAX Exped Ultra 6.5R Line Best Winter Backpacking Sleeping Pads If you’re looking for a dedicated winter backpacking sleeping pad however, pads from NEMO and Therm-a-Rest again rise to the top. The NEMO Tensor Extreme Conditions Ultralight Insulated sleeping pad (18 ounces, $250, 8.5 r-value) isn’t the most lightweight in length of name but offers a very impressive weight to r-value specification and comes in multiple shapes and sizes. The NeoAir XTherm NXT sleeping pad (16 ounces, $240, 7.3 r-value in the regular mummy) from Therm-a-Rest is available in either a weight saving mummy shape (previous link) or in their XTherm MAX version in a larger, more comfortable rectangular version. These pads are very impressive on the spec sheet and in regards to warmth to weight ratio, achieving a warmth to weight to bulk combo that would have seemed impossible to achieve a couple decades ago. However, I prefer to use my all-around 3-season type sleeping pads combined with foam pads (Therm-a-Rest RidgeRest, etc.) for winter backpacking. The r-values add up, and the foam pad offers some redundancy in extremely cold conditions. As mentioned in the previous section, another pad to look at will be the Exped Ultra 6.5R line. At a 6.9 r-value this line could be used in winter conditions but at 16 ounces for the standard size would work for your 3-season trips, as well. Summary: Best Winter Backpacking Sleeping Pads Tensor Extreme Conditions UL Insulated NeoAir XTherm NXT XTherm MAX Add-on Closed Cell Foam Pads Exped Ultra 6.5R Best Women’s Backpacking Sleeping Pads Any sleeping pad in this article can be used by either men or women. There are few women’s specific sleeping pads on the market. These are typically temperature rated such that they will be warmer per a given temperature rating. Additionally they may be shaped differently (if mummy-shaped) – generally wider in the hips, etc. for a better fit when sleeping and / or offered in shorter versions. Note that you can always use a rectangular sleeping pad for maximum room all around and / or choose a warmer pad and in various widths / lengths. Regardless for women’s sleeping pads – a market in constant flux – the Sea to Summit Women’s Ether Light XT Insulated (18 ounces, ~$200, 3.5 r-value) offers a plush 4” of height in a women’s specific shape, and would be suitable for most 3-season, typical conditions for an average sleeper (a thin foam pad could be added for a warmth boost). You might also be able to find a Therm-a-Rest ProLite Plus Women’s (23 ounces, under $100 on closeout, 3.9 r-value) – note that the specs are often not listed correctly online – this is an old-school self-inflating foam mattress that offers just 1.5” of height but offers some intrigue. While this is getting a bit heavy, 30 years ago this would have been one of the most comfortable options you could get. You can find a list of women’s backpacking sleeping pads here at REI Co-op. Summary: Best Women’s Backpacking Sleeping Pads Women’s Ether Light XT Insulated Therm-a-Rest ProLite Plus Women’s Choosing the best backpacking sleeping pad is a series of compromises – it must be comfortable enough and warm enough, but pack small enough and be light enough. This results in a compromise, but in recent years these compromises have been lessened. Most Comfortable Backpacking Sleeping Pads & Best Wide / Long Options When comfort is the most important consideration (although keep in mind no matter how cushy, you won’t be comfortable if you’re cold), the Therma-a-Rest NeoLoft sleeping pad ($250) will be hard to beat. This larger air mattress has nearly 5” of height, but is still reasonably backpackable at 25 ounces. With a 4.7 r-value this pad should still keep you warm in 3-season type conditions. If you’re backpacking in, but will then be setting up a basecamp for a few days, this pad might be up your alley. For me however, I don’t quite need to go up to NeoLoft level to find comfort on the trail and thus can save a bit of weight. I like to look for a pad long enough so my feet don’t hang off the end, and wide enough that as a toss and turn side-sleeper I don’t have to worry about falling off the side. The previously mentioned NEMO Tensor All Season sleeping pad – but in the long wide version, or the NeoAir XLite NXT MAX (in the large) are leading backpacking sleeping pad comfort contenders here. 25” wide pads are appreciated in this regard, along with a pad that is slightly longer than your height combined with a good backpacking pillow. A good backpacking pillow setup, combined with the right size sleeping pad (NEMO Tensor series shown) will go a long way towards a comfortable night on the trail. Note that any inflatable sleeping pad will be made warmer and more comfortable if you add a closed cell foam pad underneath. If you’re only using an air pad, you’ll usually want to inflate fairly firmly for more warmth, but if using a foam pad under it you can deflate the pad to a softer firmness while still having sufficient warmth in typical conditions. And, if you toss and turn at night – instead of bottoming out the pad on hard ground, even a thin foam pad will add a surprising amount of cushion for your hips. It should also be noted that while a very niche item, if you’re looking for a 2 person backpacking sleeping pad the Exped Ultra 6.5R Duo (31-43 ounces, $320, 6.9 r-value) is an intriguing choice with separate inflation chambers for each person and in Exped fashion, is a compelling choice across the board. Summary: Most Comfortable Backpacking Sleeping Pads Therma-a-Rest NeoLoft NEMO Tensor All Season (in larger sizes) NeoAir XLite NXT MAX (size large) Add-on Closed Cell Foam Pads Exped Ultra 6.5R Duo (for two) Best Budget Backpacking Sleeping Pads If the latest greatest technology and spreadsheet leaders aren’t your thing, more budget-oriented sleeping pads in the $150 or less range are without a doubt quite workable. A venerable choice has been the Exped line – this line has a great valve system, vertical baffles that I find help keep you on the pad, and larger outer baffles to keep you centered. The Exped Ultra 3R insulated sleeping pad (16 ounces, $140, 2.9 r-value) is my choice in this category. This pad is warm enough for 3-season backpacking, can be used as part of a system with additional foam pads in winter, and won’t break the bank. The Ultra line from Exped and their predecessor from Exped (Synmat series) have been part of my backpacking gear repertoire for years, as they offer a nice blend of warmth, weight, comfort, ease of use, and price. If price however is of paramount importance, look to the Therm-a-Rest RidgeRest, the Therm-a-Rest Z Lite SOL, or the NEMO Switchback. These foam pads will not be the most comfortable, and depending on the sleeper may only be barely better than nothing in the comfort department, but they do add 3-season warmth and will get the job done for around $60 or less. That said, for deals on usually more expensive inflatable pads from time to time, it’s worth checking at the REI Co-op Outlet. Summary: Best Budget Backpacking Sleeping Pads Exped Ultra 3R Therm-a-Rest RidgeRest Therm-a-Rest Z Lite SOL NEMO Switchback REI Co-op Outlet Sleeping Pads In Conclusion Finding the right sleeping pad is important on the trail, both for warmth and for comfort. To some extent this all goes hand in hand – while comfort is more than just warmth, you can’t be comfortable no matter how cushy the sleeping pad if you’re cold. When I look for a sleeping pad I look for the lightest weight sleeping pad that will keep me comfortable and warm on backpacking trips, and one that is also sufficiently durable while meeting the budget while also being easy to use. You can find a complete selection of backpacking sleeping pads mentioned in this article along with additional choices here at REI Co-op. For more on sleeping pads take a look at our article: Choosing the Best Backpacking Sleeping Pad. For more on the “Big 3” of backpacking gear, see our articles: Best Backpacking Tents by Application and Budget and Best Backpacking Sleeping Bags, as well as our Best Backpacking Backpacks Guide.

There’s something almost magical about the backpacking stove – after a long day of hiking to near exhaustion and perhaps through a chilly rain, there’s nothing like getting a hot meal going and eating a steaming meal to warm the soul so to speak. But poetic license aside, when we hit the trail we need a stove that’s lightweight and reliable. Due to varying performance at different ambient temperatures, the best choice will vary by season. While alcohol stoves were all the rage among ultralight backpackers 15-20 years ago, they are slow, the weight they save is debatable, and if a spill were to occur while running it could be a bad situation (not great with a canister stove either, however). They are perhaps best suited for ultralight overnights, or for the backpacker who doesn’t want to throw away or recycle gas canisters – an admirable approach. In a similar fashion, venerable liquid gas stoves like the MSR WhisperLite aren’t slow, but can (will in my experience) be messy, are heavy, and while offering reliable performance when it gets cold, I’ve found inverted canister stoves have been just fine on deep winter trips below 0F. While for the true backpacking chef liquid-fuel stoves are known for their simmering capability, I’m almost always wanting to eat whatever is fastest and easiest at the end of the day. When I do want to get fancy, quesadillas and the like are no problem on an upright canister stove – with the right technique and cookware – and I’ve found many modern upright canister stoves to simmer quite well. Thus, my alcohol and liquid gas stoves now occupy a bin on a shelf in my gear room, and stay there – I use some type of canister stove now for every trip. Best All-Around / 3-Season Backpacking Stoves For all-around 3-season use with temperatures above freezing or a bit below that, we need not create a lengthy list here (the winter stove list will be even shorter!). With performance that seemingly cannot be surpassed, and for over a decade, the Soto WindMaster upright canister stove (2.4 to 3.1 ounces, $70) – find our Soto WindMaster review here – has been our go-to and top choice in this category since it has been released. This stove isn’t perfect. I wish the pot supports were simply integrated into the stove…there are options for an ultralight removable 3 prong support, and offering more stability an option for a 4 prong support. However, even with the slightly heavier 4Flex support the stove weighs just 3 ounces and this support can be left on in a semi-permanent fashion and folds partially for easier packing. I’ve also had the piezo igniter fail once in over a decade of backpacking trips with this stove. Carry a lighter for backup and in your emergency kit. The piezo was replaced and makes the stove easy to use – I prefer an integrated piezo igniter on a stove whenever I can get it. A stove should include a way to light itself. Any cons now explained, the Soto WindMaster offers consistent performance across a wide range of conditions, temperatures, and canister fuel levels due to its micro regulator valve system. To explain as briefly as possible, a regulator on a stove will automatically adjust in regards to pressure of the canister – which changes based on ambient temperature, elevation, and due to the amount of gas left in the canister, to give you more consistent performance. While the Soto micro regulator system oddly seemed to generate much controversy when released, it works. It does add some complexity to the design of the stove (while simplifying use), however using this stove compared to a non-regulated upright canister stove is night and day. Looking for a 3-season upright canister stove for backpacking? You can very much just get the Soto WindMaster with the 4Flex pot support with no looking back. That said following the Soto WindMaster release, MSR released an update to their venerable PocketRocket series – the PocketRocket Deluxe (2.9 ounces, $85). You can read our full PocketRocket Deluxe stove review here. Adding a regulator to their already popular stove series made this stove even better, and to give credit where credit is due, this stove has the best piezo system of any stove I’ve ever used. It’s more integrated, protected, easier to use, and just well designed – one of those things that you just like to use. In our testing we didn’t find the MSR’s valve to have quite the effect when compared to the Soto, and at $85, it’s not cheap. That said, this is a solid stove and the integrated pot supports are just what the doctor ordered. MSR's ignition system on the PocketRocket Deluxe is best in class. If you are looking to save weight but save cash as well however, there are various, very cost-effective (and simple) upright canister stoves available that many backpackers have used with success. However, when it comes to this category and considering what we’re dealing with, I prefer to stick with more of a name brand. For a non-regulated upright canister stove (best for warmer temps, you may want to toss the canister in your sleeping bag to keep it warm along with needing to use other tricks and being patient with slower performance), options like the Toaks Titanium Backpacking Stove (1.6 ounces, $30) and a personal, nostalgic favorite of mine that has stood the test of time – the Snow Peak GigaPower (4.23 ounces, $40) are both worth a look. Various integrated all-in-one stove systems are available, however I do not typically like the tall / narrow cookpots that come with these systems and prefer to mix and match my own gear – see our backpacking cookware guide for more. However, if you’re mostly boiling water, don’t mind the significant upfront weight (although they are fast and efficient), the cookpot included works for your cooking, and you need something as wind-resistant as possible these can be worth a look while knocking a cookpot off your list as well. The MSR WindBurner Personal Stove System (16 ounces, $200) is unique here in that it features a radiant burner with MSR claiming it to be windproof with a capacity good for 2 typical freeze dried meals. There is no igniter on this stove and MSR recommends a lighter or match. Summary: Best Overall & 3-season Backpacking Stoves Soto WindMaster 4Flex Soto WindMaster w/ TriFlex & 4Flex MSR PocketRocket Deluxe Toaks Titanium Backpacking Stove Snow Peak Giga Power 2.0 Auto MSR WindBurner Personal Stove System Best Winter Backpacking Stoves If you were to choose one of the stoves above for most of your 3-season trips, as I have, you’ll need one more stove in the gear stash if you want to go backpacking year round and during the winter seasons. Upright canister stoves are simple, but pressure in the canister decreases as it gets colder. When it’s very cold, and we’ll likely be melting snow for water and running our stove for long durations (cooling the canister even more due to evaporative cooling), another solution is needed no matter how fancy of an upright canister stove you might have. Traditionally, the solution for this was to use a liquid gas stove like the MSR WhisperLite series (15 ounces, $200). These stoves are still a good choice, however they need to be primed and in my experience, gas will inevitably leak or get spilled. There is something special about them when they’re running, but for my needs I’ll turn to an inverted canister solution here. That said, if you can’t decide between liquid gas and a remote inverted canister stove, the WhisperLite Universal has you covered. By having the ability to turn the canister upside down with a remote canister setup, you can now enter a liquid feed mode, relying now on the omnipresent effect of gravity rather than the changing pressures within a canister. Additionally since the canister is remote, you can often use a windscreen (check directions, it's often included). For a remote canister stove and as might be expected, we can turn to MSR here. Their WindPro II remote canister stove – you’ll be around 11 ounces all packed and this stove will cost you about $140 – has served me well with solid performance on those winter trips melting snow for water…below 0F type backpacking trips. For more on this stove, take a look at our WindPro II stove review. This stove is a bit heavy for me for a summer trip, but then again if I could only have one stove this would be it and I reach for it without hesitation when packing for a winter trip. Unfortunately, this stove doesn’t have a built-in ignition system. This can be solved by carrying an add-on piezo igniter. Summary: Best Winter (Cold Weather) Backpacking Stoves MSR WhisperLite Universal MSR WhisperLite International MSR WindPro II Remote Canister Stove Best Backpacking Stoves: In Conclusion If you want to backpack across all seasons and want to buy just one stove, go for a winter-capable stove and just carry the weight in the summer. You’ll be carrying around an extra half pound, however, and these stoves do take up more pack space. My preference is to have a dedicated winter stove and an upright canister stove for warmer and even shoulder season trips – regulated stoves are great for this but their additional performance can only do so much when the weather gets bitter cold. For more on the best fuel to use for all these canister stoves we’ve discussed, check out our article on the best backpacking canister fuel. For more on different types of backpacking stoves, stove theory, and design considerations, see our guide on How to Choose the Best Backpacking Stove. For a full selection of 3-season and winter-ready backpacking stoves of all types, see this page at REI Co-op.

Good afternoon, I plan on a recon trip to Little D to find the best way to ascend/descend the mesa. ONX provides two alternatives to All Trails. What route did you use to Ascent the mesa? The further west up to the mesa? Thanks for your recon. Great stuff.

Hi Carl and welcome!

Hello everyone. I’m Carl, currently operating out of the Anniston/Oxford, Alabama area. Before moving here, worked as an engineer in Florida and was relatively outdoorsy being a kayak fisherman and occasionally camped on the spoil islands, also dabbled in rock climbing (boulder and top rope) for a year or two. However, as soon as I went into the Cheaha I instantly fell in love with the hiking! I'm using the Talladega National Forest and the Pinhoti as my local testing grounds to hopefully launch my backpacking career! I am looking to share information and experience in this community and hopefully get some expedition friends to take on some ambitious adventures in the future. Although if anyone is in the Cheaha, Talladega, or even within the 2.5 - 5 hr range into Georgia, Tennesee, and South Carolina, wants to do some weekend adventures let me know! I just know I do prefer hikes with a little bit more bite and gruel to them haha. Recent hikes I've done since start of this year: Cave Trail - Pinhoti Loop (13.5 mi, 2400 ft) Walls of Jericho (8.2 mi, 1,457 ft) A lot of Lake Cheaha loop rucking These are mostly training trips for an Olympic Peninsula (Hoh, Mt. Ellinor, Rialto) May adventure and Glacier National Park 6-day backpacking trip in July. I'm also eyeing Linville Gorge for a Sept/Oct adventure as well. Thanks for having me, looking forward to meeting you all!

On any hiking or backpacking trip, the ability to procure drinking water during the hike is one of the most important logistical considerations for both pre-trip planning as well as while we’re on the trail. Finding the water is of course the first step, and having the necessary gear to properly process the water so it’s suitable to drink is the second part of the equation. Here we’ll look at the main types of water filters and backcountry water treatment methods that are best suited for backpacking and hiking, and elaborate on the necessary reading between the lines that needs to be done when choosing the best backpacking water filters or treatment options for backcountry use. An assortment of various types of backcountry water treatment options Backpacking & Hiking Water Treatment: What We Need to Treat & Filter Microorganisms and Biological Concerns While protozoan concerns such as giardia and cryptosporidium get the most publicity, concerns are best looked at in a categorical fashion. Starting with biological contaminants from smallest to largest, viruses (example: hepatitis, rotavirus, often smaller than .1 micron) are notoriously difficult to filter as they can slip through most common filter’s pore size. Luckily, viruses are mostly a concern where there are many other people – for example where you might find untreated sewage. However, it’s always important to remember the source of the water you’re filtering. Bacteria (example: E.Coli, Salmonella, average size greater than .3 microns) are a more common concern in the wilderness as they are spread by both humans and wildlife, but luckily they are larger than viruses and more easily captured by most common filters. Protozoa are a bit larger and include cryptosporidium and giardia, and a filter that will filter to 1 micron or smaller is recommended for removal. Concerns that are larger still include tapeworm eggs and unsightly, but not necessarily dangerous, critters of various types in your water such as insect larvae. On many occasions I’ve scooped water from crystal clear mountain streams and upon close inspection, have been quite surprised at what that scoop reveals to the eye – from sticks and stones to tadpoles and worms of various types – not to mention what you can’t see. I prefer to get my calories from my food bag while backpacking, and luckily these larger organisms are of course, very easily filtered. Water sources will vary in purity, but various types of backcountry water treatment and filtration methods are available and can be utilized. Each method offers pros and cons, and I often prefer to use methods / technologies in combination depending on the trip. Other Treatment Considerations Many other components can make up the water you’re drinking in the backcountry as well. Chemicals, pesticides and herbicides, heavy metals, tannins, silt, taste and odor, as well as natural particulates of various types will need to be considered. Some of these concerns will only affect smell and taste, others could affect your health. Visible suspended matter is removed by most filters, but tannins and taste / smell can pass through – in my experience even drinking tea colored water however, has been fine. If your water source is downstream of an area that has seen prior or active agricultural or mining use for example, chemicals and other various components introduced by man could be in the water source, especially as you move further downstream in the water supply chain. To reduce these types of contaminants and concerns we can utilize a purifier or filter that contains a carbon stage, or add a carbon element or step to an existing setup to assist in reducing many of these possible impurities. Physical Backpacking & Hiking Water Filters / Purifiers Most water treatment products designed for backcountry use that are reasonably lightweight, will not address all of the above concerns in one fell swoop. Thus, we need to evaluate our backpacking and hiking destinations, as well as our own personal comfort level to find the best compromise. For backpacking in the mountainous wilderness areas of the United States for example, the general consensus is that viruses are usually not of a great concern, and many times our water sources are fairly pure from man-made pollution as we’re getting it close to the source. In these cases bacteria and protozoa are usually the main concerns. Other backcountry trips may find us filtering water on the banks of a river far from the source, that has passed through many towns before we consume it, perhaps on foreign soil, and the full gamut of contaminants are more of a possibility. Water filters do just what they say; they filter the water to a certain micron level to remove bacteria and protozoa. Water purification by definition, including options like the First Need XLE will take this all a step further by also removing viruses, though not all products that are officially listed as purifiers will remove or reduce chemicals, heavy metals, tannins, debris, etc. – your water may be purified by marketing general standards, but it will not necessarily be “pure”. A classic pump filter works well for pulling water out of hard to reach and shallow sources. Popular water filters for backcountry water treatment should filter to an absolute pore size of .3 microns or smaller for adequate removal of bacteria, protozoa, and all things larger. Note the absolute part of the pore size equation, as filters listed with a “nominal” pore size will only on average filter to that level. Absolute is a guarantee, and is the number we’re actually interested in. If you prefer viral protection, you will need an option with a much smaller absolute pore size; as a result flow rate will likely suffer and these types of purifiers are rare. Alternatively some filters combine with other technology to treat the virus part using an iodine or ion exchange process. Backpacking water purifiers that remove viruses physically are rare but can be found in the MSR Guardian pump purifier. Other options combine a normal filter with a cartridge that contains an iodinated resin for added virus protection, while the Grayl purifier uses an ion exchange process to achieve this goal. Physical filtration can be achieved utilizing various types of elements and technologies. The most popular lightweight water filter technology today, hollow fiber filters work by passing water through a multitude of small tubes; tubes that are perforated by many, many, pores so small (rated to the micron) that anything larger than this pore size cannot pass through, trapping any living organisms or non-living matter larger than the pore size. Hollow fiber filters are popular for their light weight and versatility – you can pretty much find one in any filter configuration you prefer – be that as a gravity filter, inline filter, or pump. Hollow Fiber Filtration Hollow fiber filters can usually be backflushed to help restore flow rate, and flow rate will vary depending on pore size, surface area, and use. The most popular hollow fiber filters are in the .1 to .2 micron range making them sufficient for bacteria and protozoa, and this micron level is usually a good balance of protection, sufficient flow rate, and lifespan. Smaller micron, virus-rated filters also exist in this category as seen with the aforementioned MSR Guardian purifier, but flow rate will be slower due to the smaller pore size. Gravity filters, an example shown here using hollow fiber filter technology, use the force of gravity to move water through the filter. Hollow fiber filters cannot be allowed to freeze when wet (the MSR Guardian is an exception) or after they've been used, so on trips where it will freeze at night you’ll need to sleep with the filter in your sleeping bag or carry it in your pocket any time temperatures begin to flirt with freezing during the day – this goes for nearly all other filters using different types of elements as well. In addition to freezing, physical filters also need to be treated with some care in regards to drops and impacts, which could damage the element. Some hollow fiber filters like the Platypus GravityWorks (read our full GravityWorks review here), and the Katadyn BeFree have manufacturer supported integrity tests which are very helpful for a little peace of mind – unlike other gear, you can’t really tell if a filter is working properly or not, without this test. Ceramic Media Other types of physical filter media will use a ceramic element like the MSR EX filter, and the Katadyn Pocket Filter, or utilize a glass fiber element like the venerable Katadyn Hiker Pro. Ceramic filters have the ability to be repeatedly field cleaned. Some filters are entirely self-contained and will need to be thrown away when their flow rate diminishes too much to be of practical use, while others setups will have a replaceable cartridge that fits into a housing. In the Field with Physical Filters No matter what filter technology you end up going with, physical filters are most often utilized in an inline, gravity, squeeze, or pump configuration. The traditional pump water filter requires you to pump the water through the filter element via a hose in the water source, and is a proven setup at both getting you water and providing an ample upper body workout. Pump Filters Pump filters have moving parts and increase the complication and weight, but these are also great for pulling water out of hard to reach places. The other methods will require you to fill some type of reservoir with dirty water first, by either submerging the dirty water container or bag in the water source or, if it’s one of those shallow or small sources you occasionally may need to use a separate vessel to fill the dirty container, like a mug (boil later to sterilize). An inline water filter connected to a hydration setup treats water as you drink. Gravity Filters Gravity setups like the Platypus GravityWorks and the Katadyn Gravity BeFree let gravity do the work for you, by filling a dirty reservoir with water and by elevating, hanging from a tree branch or rock if possible, water passes through the filter element into a clean container. Inline setups such as the MSR Thru-Link splice into the tubing of your hydration reservoir and your own drinking force filters the water with each sip, while with squeeze setups like the Sawyer Squeeze, you can utilize a combination of gravity and squeezing force to move the dirty water through the filter and the filtered water into a clean vessel or drink directly. Water Bottle & Straw Filters Other options integrate the filter into a water bottle (LifeStraw Go Series) or softbottle (BeFree), where much in the same manner as an inline filter with a hydration reservoir, your drinking or a combination of drinking and squeezing is what filters the water as you go. Straw type options like the Lifestraw Peak (view at REI) are also another strategy, treating water by directly inserting one end into a water source and drinking from the other side of the straw. A straw filter is limited in that you cannot process larger volumes of water and each sip takes more work, and straw filters are perhaps best reserved more for emergency usage. Prolonging Filter Life In whatever case, seek out the cleanest water possible to prolong the life of your filter and for the best flow rate. While many filters can be backflushed or cleaned, this is usually a losing battle over time. Although filters are rated by the gallon or liter in regards to their lifespan, and while it’s a great idea to evaluate this when choosing a filter, take this number with a grain of salt. Clean water is important for other treatment methods as well; in very turbid situations it’s a good idea to allow water to settle in a separate container (in for example, a Sea to Summit Bucket), then treat from the top. Luckily, this is more of the exception than the norm for most of us. Backcountry UV Water Treatment Ultraviolet treatment options like those offered by Steripen, come in various forms using either normal or rechargeable batteries, and utilize, as with many municipalities, UV light from a special lamp that’s inserted into your water container to neutralize many microorganisms by disrupting their DNA. This process usually takes about a minute and you’ll most likely be treating a liter of water or so at a time. Some other UV bottles have come (and gone) to / from the market that feature an integrated lamp, and yet others have been designed to float from the surface of your water vessel. UV water treatment uses battery powered ultraviolet light that's inserted in a container to treat many microorganisms. On the plus side, these UV treatment options are quite effective at neutralizing the things that physical filters have the toughest time with – viruses – and the technology is proven. However, many are not comfortable relying on an electronic and potentially fragile instrument for their main or only wilderness water treatment source. Additionally, UV light on its own is not sufficient for neutralizing all living organisms that could be present in your water – tapeworm eggs for example, or larger organisms and larvae that may or may not do any harm but may not necessarily be what you want to ingest, nor will a UV product remove anything from the water or improve its composition. If the water is dirty, you’ll be drinking dirty water. Steripen offers a filter with a 40x40 micron mesh screen that can help here, which is intended to reduce organic matter or particulates. Performance may also be insufficient in murky water, requiring pre-filtration. All said, this is an excellent technology as long as you’re aware of the limitations; I utilize a Steripen Adventurer Opti as a secondary treatment with a hollow fiber filter on any trip where I desire viral treatment. Chemical Water Treatment Chemical treatment usually utilizing chlorine dioxide (Aquamira) or Iodine (Potable Aqua) and on occasion some other chemicals like household bleach or other chemicals that produce chlorine, like Aquatabs can be effective, but like anything this category has its share of pros and cons. In contrast to physical filters and like UV treatment, chemicals are again effective against viruses, but often take longer (hours) to work on such concerns as cryptosporidium (4 hours) and these products will add a taste to your water; other products are not suitable for cryptosporidium whatsoever. Advocates for chemical treatments praise the ease of just adding the treatment right into their water bottles and allowing the treatment to take place as they hike. To be honest, most of my thought goes into making sure my drinking water source is either free of any chemicals or how to reduce or remove them should there be any chance of them being present, so chemical treatment is a bit counter-productive from my point of view, and options like iodine are not an option for pregnant women or those with any type of a thyroid issue. Iodine and chlorine (i.e. bleach) on their own, are not effective against cryptosporidium. However, this method is lightweight and over the years has been popular with ultralight backpackers, though decreasing in recent years with the increased availability of very light hollow fiber filters like the Sawyer Mini. In this category, other devices have seen the market over the years that create a solution with salt to create an oxidant solution that you subsequently dissolve in water; but as with other chemical treatments, with a 4 hour wait time these are not the quickest of options. An example can be found in the discontinued MSR MIOX. These devices seem to come and go from the market. Chemical treatment may also be integrated with some filters to move them into the purifier category. As with boiling, chemical treatment can be a good backup to bring as well or to utilize in conjunction with other methods. Hundreds of miles from the source, I took extra steps in my treatment process at this backcountry location. Boiling Boiling water is an excellent way to neutralize microorganisms that might be present, but it takes a while, requires a lot of fuel, and let’s be honest, on a hot summer day, who wants to drink steaming hot water when we could be drinking that crisp and cold water from a mountain stream? As such, boiling can be tough to utilize as a main water treatment method on most 3 season backpacking trips, but it’s an excellent method to keep in mind as a backup method should your filter or other method fail you. In winter however, melting snow for water may be your best and only option. Be sure to bring a big pot (my Evernew 1.3 works well solo) and a stove that will work well during continued usage in cold conditions like the MSR WindPro II – read our WindPro II review here. Opinions on how long to boil water vary widely; the CDC suggests bringing water to a rolling boil for 1 minute, or for 3 full minutes at altitudes above 6562 feet (be sure to check that 2 on the end of your altimeter!). Data suggests however that pathogens are neutralized at lower temperatures; in the end it depends on heat and time but luckily, both are achieved by bringing your water to a boil and after removal from heat. Carbon Filtration As we’ve seen, the technologies used above are all mainly designed to thwart microorganisms. If improving the taste and smell of your water, or if any agricultural and / or industrial contamination is a concern, look for a system that integrates filtration technology combined with a carbon stage that will improve and / or reduce, but not necessarily eliminate, these concerns. If desired, a carbon element can be integrated into an existing system using a modular approach to filter water further. This will increase the weight of your system, and possibly the cost of replacement elements, etc., but there is of course no free lunch. The Grayl UltraPress and Katadyn Hiker Pro are all examples of filters with integrated carbon filtration – or if you’re like me and have settled on a treatment method that does not address this concern, but you may occasionally head out on a trip where some of these concerns would be nice to cover, you can always splice in an add-on carbon element (I use an add on GravityWorks Carbon Element) for this purpose when needed. My Approach to Backcountry Water Treatment For a complicated issue, there are unfortunately no one size fits all solutions and in the end, when we’re concerned about not carrying extra weight, it all comes down to a compromise and what each one of us is most interested in removing from our water. Luckily there are many lightweight and effective options out there to choose from. For general backpacking we should expect to find an option that will treat what we’re concerned with for around a pound or less. About half a pound is usually doable, and lighter options of just a few ounces are very realistic to target. The best backpacking water filter or water treatment method very much depends on the task at hand. Most of my trips are very well served by standard hollow fiber filtration technology; as with all of us most likely, my preference is to backpack into areas where the water is already fairly good. As such I’m not usually concerned about viruses or pollution, (both a Steripen and carbon filter have a spot in the gear room for such destinations to use in conjunction with a hollow fiber filter), and I like to target the removal of bacteria, protozoa, and the removal of larger critters no matter their parasitical intent or lack thereof. The hollow fiber filter also has that added benefit of giving your water a good scrub; removing particulate matter. I really like a filter that has a manufacturer supported integrity test as well, so it essentially comes down to the cartridge for me. The Platypus GravityWorks cartridge fits all of the above criteria, and it just so happens the whole setup it comes with works well and is pretty darn convenient to use both on the trail as well as in camp. For a complete list of backcountry-ready, tried and tested backpacking water filters and treatment methods that you can sort and filter by all the main points we’ve discussed in this post, check out this page at REI.

Spring comes slowly to the high country of the Rockies and other mountain ranges in the western United States. As the days get longer and temperatures rise, summer backpacking season seems tantalizingly close. But between the snow melting and the summer wildflowers blooming is a period of time colloquially referred to as "mud season". Depending on elevation and latitude, mud season might last from mid-March to late May, give or take a few weeks. With snow melting and spring rains mixed in, many trails turn to muddy messes or even small-scale streams if the drainage isn't designed properly or the water bars (structures built across the trail to divert water) aren't cleaned out. Tips for Hiking During Mud Season Not only is hiking in these conditions unpleasant, it can also damage the trails. Fortunately, many trails in the Southwest are in excellent condition during late spring and make great destinations. February through May is a great time to plan a trip to national parks, wilderness areas, and other public lands in Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah, for example. If you're not able to get to the Southwest, there are still ways to make the most of mud season. Giving your gear a good cleaning and condition check is always something worth making time for, but can be easier said than done on nice sunny weekends. If travel to other regions is not on the agenda, exploring other outdoor activities, like road bicycling or running, can be great ways to get in shape for when hiking season truly arrives. Different Trails, Different Mud Seasons And by becoming familiar with your local trails you can gain a good intuition and understanding for which ones will be quagmires at certain times of the year and which ones might be passable. Sandy soils or trails with good drainage, or those in the rain shadow of a mountain range, are good places to target. For example, when many of the trails in the mountains are muddy other destinations at lower elevations often offer some good hiking or vice-versa. Each region has its own nuances, and figuring those out is half the fun – it’s all about knowing your region and your opportunities! Mud season trail Hike Early in the Day During Mud Season Other ways to deal with mud season is to hit the trail for dayhikes as early in the morning as possible, as often times during this time of the year overnight temperatures are still in the freezing range (subsequently freezing any muddy trail solid, saving both the trail as well as your gear from mud). By hiking early, you can often get a hike in and be heading out just as things start to warm up and thaw for the day. Mud Season Footwear Waterproof footwear combined with hiking gaiters is also helpful at this time of the year – this will help keep not only water, but the mud out of your shoes or boots. Editor's Note: This Jargon installment originally appeared in Issue 45 of TrailGroove Magazine. You can read the original article here.

A spur of the moment side trip landed us in the Guadalupe Mountains National Park with easy access to the tallest point in Texas. Guadalupe Peak looms over the surrounding desert flatlands at a respectable 8,751 feet, accessible only after paying the price of a grueling 8.4 mile round-trip, 3000-foot elevation gain trail. This is truly a spectacular not-to-be-missed hike that comes with bragging rights for ascending the highest peak in Texas. Located in Guadalupe Mountains National Park, Guadalupe Peak offers a challenging hike with expansive, rewarding views. Hiking to the Summit of Guadalupe Peak There is nothing predictable about this trail; we hiked it in early April during unseasonably cool weather and were surprised with a wide range of weather conditions. Our hike started out sunny, with warm temperatures and calm winds that changed to light wind, cooler temperatures and even a few snow flurries as we ascended toward the peak. That being the said, it’s not unusual to start out in sweltering heat and arrive at the top needing some serious cold weather gear. We were lucky to have a break in the wind and clouds when we arrived at the top that allowed us to take time to enjoy the view of Texas and southern New Mexico to the north. This is a shoulder season hike, best hiked during the cooler months of the year. Peak seasons in the park are March through May and September through December when average high temperatures are less than 80 degrees. The trail is well maintained and a reasonable (but constant) grade. The steepest portion is in the first couple of miles. A few sheer drop offs are not for the faint of heart. However, the trail is wide with passing room along virtually the entire trail and the cliff side paths make for impressive photos. Many families make this hike with children. Sturdy hiking shoes or boots will make the mostly rock tread easier on your feet but are not required. We opted to use trekking poles, but most hikers went up fine without them (we like to use trekking poles so we can take in the scenery with less risk of stumbling). As you make your way up from the trailhead at roughly 5750’ to 8751’ elevation at the top you’ll notice the stark changes in your surroundings from the high desert to high elevation pinyon tree forests. The progression offers a fascinating lesson on the adaptability of flora and fauna to these unique ecosystems. We didn’t see too much in the way of wildlife on the hike, except for a few lizards on the rocks and vultures and hawks flying overhead. An earlier start would likely provide a better chance to see some of the local animals (gray fox, skunks, porcupine, mule deer, snakes, etc.). Those that make the trek are rewarded with a 360-degree view for miles on end with mountain peaks rising from the surrounding Chihuahuan Desert. Guadalupe Mountains National Park is home to eight of the highest peaks in Texas including the impressive sheer limestone bluff, El Capitan, not to be confused with the similarly named and equally impressive rock formation in Yosemite National Park. There is no trail to the top of El Capitan, but the best view in the park is from atop Guadalupe Peak. Off in the distance, and barely visible are the 2,000-acre gypsum sand dunes on the west side of the park. The monument on Guadalupe Peak is a quirky pyramid that was put on the peak before it became a National Park and commemorates the transcontinental overland and air mail carriers. If you plan your trip during the spring, you’re likely to see spectacular blooms that may even include the rare Guadalupe Mountain violet! The hike starts out in the high desert and passes through high elevation pine forests. If you have an extra day, and don't mind carrying a backpack and extra water, you could camp overnight at the backcountry campsite one mile from the summit and enjoy star gazing before summiting the next morning and possibly catching sunrise from the peak. Guadalupe Mountains is sometimes described as the least visited national park, but it’s one not to be missed in our book. Need to Know Information The National Park Service advises carrying one gallon of water per day and turning back when half your water is gone. There are no water sources on this trail. No-fee backcountry wilderness permits are available at the visitor’s center up to one day in advance. The campground with five tent sites is one mile below the peak. All toilet paper and solid waste is required to be removed in a commercial toilet bag (Wag-Bag or the Restop 2, etc). One bag per person, per day is required for backpackers and you may be asked to show proof you have the required bags before obtaining your permit. Guadalupe Mountains is in the Mountain time zone although your smart phones and other devices may try to convince you otherwise since the nearest towers transmit from the Central time zone. The sparsely populated area makes Guadalupe an ideal location for dark sky viewing. There is a fee to enter the park, however the wilderness permit is free. Getting There Guadalupe Mountains National Park is located in west Texas about 2 hours east of El Paso. The trailhead parking lot holds only a few cars and fills up quickly even on weekdays. There is additional parking at the visitor center and the well maintained trail to the trailhead adds a bonus mile to your hike. A quick stop at the Pine Springs Visitor Center is highly recommended for the latest forecast and sage advice. If you are planning an overnight excursion you must get a backcountry permit here. Pine Springs Campground is located at the trailhead with 13 RV sites and 20 tent sites. These must be reserved in advance and the campground is often full. Chosa Primitive Camping Area, a much larger campground managed by the BLM is 29 miles to the northeast on the road to Carlsbad Caverns National Park. It is suitable for both tents and RVs. Chosa is a dispersed, dry camping free area with no facilities. Best Time to Go The best time to hike would be spring and fall to avoid possible extreme summer heat. Start early in the day. Maps & Books The park is covered in the National Geographic Trails Illustrated Guadalupe Mountains National Park map. In addition, the Delorme Texas Atlas can help with getting to and from this and other destinations in the state. In regards to guidebooks, see Hiking Carlsbad Caverns & Guadalupe Mountains National Parks as well as Best Easy Day Hikes Carlsbad Caverns and Guadalupe Mountains National Parks.

Zion National Park is one of my favorite national parks, and for good reason: there are amazing views, beautiful cliffs and streams, abundant photography opportunities, and wonderful hikes. The park has several well-known popular hikes – The Subway, Zion Narrows, and Angel’s Landing for example – but there are some other shorter or lesser known hikes that are also well worth your while. I have made a couple of short visits as part of my mountain biking and hiking trips over the past two years, and these two hikes stand out as favorites. Both are relatively short and have breathtaking views. Looking out from the alcove along the Canyon Overlook Trail in Zion National Park Hiking the Canyon Overlook Trail in Zion A very short hike, by most hiker’s standards, Canyon Overlook Trail is just a half-mile long well-maintained route. It is quite popular, so solitude is not usually part of the experience here. The trail starts off with a climb up rock steps leading past a “bonsai” tree and along a cliff edge high above the Pine Creek Slot Canyon. The trail has handrails in places to protect sightseeing tourists from falling to their doom while gazing at the amazing scenery. The main rock that forms the massive cliffs of the park is of early Jurassic age (about 180 million years old) Navajo sandstone, a formation that was laid down in a vast sand dune field covering much of what we now call the Colorado Plateau. The sand is cross-bedded, showing the layers of the dunes as they shifted and blew across the area. With this thick formation now exposed to wind, water, and freeze-thaw cycles, the rock has been eroded into fantastic shapes, exposing the layers and colors. Along the hike to the canyon overlook there is a section of the trail which passes under an overhanging rock that forms a small cave-like alcove, plus hanging gardens with plants growing on the vertical rock faces and a bridge suspended above the canyon. Arriving at the end, the views open up and you are treated to a view toward the west, where you can see the massive (over 2,000 foot high) orange, pink, and cream-colored cliff walls of the main Zion Canyon. Visible from the overlook are peaks with names such as Bridge Mountain, The West Temple, Towers of the Virgin, Altar of Sacrifice, The Streaked Wall, and The Sentinel. It took my group of four mountain bikers about an hour to complete the hike (on foot) while taking plenty of photos. The Canyon Overlook (left) and Many Pools (right) hikes in Zion offer stunning scenery and relatively easy hiking. Many Pools Hike in Zion Another short, but lesser-known hike on the east side of Zion National Park is along a canyon known unofficially as “Many Pools.” This hike is not along established trails, but instead follows a fairly wide drainage that rises to the north. On my visit, we hiked just under a mile up the canyon and gained about 600 feet of elevation by the upper end. We could have continued further, but we were running out of time for this day. Views from all along this canyon are spectacular in every direction. On the hike, you pass several of the pools or potholes, which are places where the flowing water has eroded the Navajo sandstone and formed low areas where water collects. We saw several of these pools filled with water, and some that were dried up when we were there in May of 2022. There were even a few tadpoles in a couple of the pools. To the sides of the wash, there are interesting hoodoo formations, as well as areas with several different colors of rock and lots of cross-bedding. Hiking is mostly easy, with only a few areas where you will need to bushwhack through low shrubs and trees and a couple steeper places that are easily climbed over or around. This is an excellent hike in east Zion, and took my group less than two hours to finish. It’s an excellent spot that is less busy than many other trails in Zion, and affords you with stellar views of the eastern part of the park. Looking south from the upper part of the canyon (Many Pools). Final Thoughts There are many other hikes in Zion, but these two are fairly easy and show you a good example of the geology and scenery of the eastern part of the park. Utah offers countless hiking opportunities and one can spend many years exploring the various corners of the state. As far as views go, in my opinion, you can’t beat Zion National Park, and the two hikes mentioned here are an excellent introduction to the views and experience the park has to offer. Need to Know Information No permit is required for these hikes. There are certain other hikes in the park which DO require permits. The park has an entry fee of $35 for private vehicles, or you can purchase an annual national park pass for $80. For more hiking and backpacking ideas in Zion, see our TrailFinder Page with links to all of our previous TrailGroove Zion articles and find even more by searching for Zion here. Getting There Parking for the Canyon Overlook Trailhead is just east of the eastern end of Zion-Mount Carmel Tunnel. Parking is limited to two small parking areas and a few roadside spots, but we had to wait only a few minutes (we were there around 8:00 am on May 1st) for a hiker to return from their hike and vacate their parking spot. During busy times of the day, it may be necessary to return several times to get a space. For Many Pools, parking is at a small parking area less than one mile to the east of the eastern tunnel along Zion-Mount Carmel Highway on the eastern side of the park. There is an outhouse at this parking lot. From the parking lot, walk east along the road (be careful as the shoulders are very narrow) for about 500 feet, then cross to the western side of the road. From there, you will descend into the lower end of Many Pools Canyon. The hike continues to the north up the drainage. Best Time to Go For the Canyon Overlook Trail, morning is best for photography, as the view is to the west and the canyon walls will be well-lit during the morning. Sunset may be another good time if clouds are just right, but the canyon will be in shadow then. Any time of day would be good for photography at Many Pools, as the views from Many Pools Canyon are mainly to the south. The hike would be most interesting after there has been sufficient rain to fill the potholes, but it would be a good hike at any time of the year. In summer, try to avoid the hottest part of the day, as it is quite exposed to the sun. Maps and Books The National Geographic Trails Illustrated Zion National Park map is a great general map of the park. Canyon Overlook Trail is shown on the map, but Many Pools is not. Trails Illustrated also offers a Zion Day Hikes map and the Utah Delorme Atlas can be helpful for getting to and from trailheads and exploring the rest of the state. For a guidebook on the area, see Best Easy Day Hikes, Zion and Bryce Canyon National Parks as well as Hiking Zion and Bryce Canyon.

Before you begin to narrow down your choice of a sleeping bag or jacket for backpacking usage, there’s one key decision you must arrive at first: the choice of down vs. synthetic insulation. The source of much debate, both options have mostly pros and a few cons. In this post we’ll detail why you might choose one over the other and detail the performance of down and synthetic insulation across various backpacking situations. Down and synthetic backpacking jackets Down Insulation The lightest and most compressible option, down insulation can either be goose down or duck down. Down insulation is rated by fill power (fp) – which is simply a measurement of how many cubic inches one ounce of down will fill. For non-backpacking usage this is non-consequential and lower rated fill power jackets could be utilized for example to save cash (the jacket will just be heavier), but when you’re carrying everything on your back, this is a key number. Higher fill power gear is more expensive, with top of the line jackets and sleeping bags typically using somewhere around 900fp or so. At these higher fill power levels down will give you the lightest and most compressible insulated gear available, but at the most cost. With down you also need to be careful not to get it wet, but this goes for all your gear no matter what it's made from. However, when down does get completely soaked, it takes forever to dry and retains less warmth than synthetics. This can be mitigated by taking standard precautions to keep your gear dry and I’ve found this to mostly be a nuisance when I wash gear at home. That said, on backpacking trips where you are in constant, unrelenting rain day after day with near 100% humidity, your sleeping bag will not have a chance to dry during the day in your pack – and inevitably will absorb some level of moisture every night especially if there is condensation inside your tent. This can lead to degradation in warmth of the bag – without it being completely soaked – after several days. High fill power down cluster Hoping to remedy the situation, chemically treated down has gained significant market traction in recent years – and treated down seeks to help with any potential doubts here by applying a Durable Water Repellent (DWR) treatment to the down itself. I have found that DWR treated down does not quite have the same type of loft (it’s a bit clumpy) compared to high quality non-treated down. Additionally, the natural oils in down make it naturally water resistant. However, treated down does perform better in tests when it comes to its ability to resist water and may offer some additional peace of mind. Another thing to keep in mind is that (and this goes for down or synthetic) your jacket and / or sleeping bag shell fabric likely already has a DWR treatment and will resist light rain or condensation, for a period of time. Being one of the heaviest things you carry, a down sleeping bag is a great item to target to save weight. Synthetic Insulation Synthetic insulation comes in many forms and in many names, and while some perform better than others performance can still be described in general terms here. Synthetic insulation will be cheaper, but compared to high quality down – it doesn’t pack up as small and will weigh more to provide the same level of warmth. In addition, longevity is a concern and synthetic insulation will not retain its loft over the years with many uses like a well-cared for down sleeping bag or garment will. Synthetic insulated ultralight backpacking jacket Synthetic insulation does retain more heat when it’s wet as it will not completely collapse when soaked through, and it will dry faster than down…although sleeping in a soaked synthetic sleeping bag will still not be all that comfortable. When you take thick synthetic insulation and wrap it in a high denier nylon or polyester shell on both sides it can still take quite a while to totally dry – even days to dry for a sleeping bag or thick jacket (unless you find an opportunity to put it in the sun). However, it does perform better in consistently wet conditions and will often get you on the trail for less cash than top of the line down. Synthetic may be the better choice for those that are not looking to save weight and have plenty of room in their pack, or basecamp type backpacking. If you’re one to wear an insulated jacket while actually hiking during the day (I never do this), synthetic will deal with sweat better, but best to take the jacket off before that happens no matter what insulation choice you go with. You’ll want to take extra care of your synthetic insulation – as while longevity is good and getting better, synthetic gear can only stand so many compression and use cycles before the loft begins to degrade (a well-cared for down bag will last decades or more). A synthetic sleeping bag will cost the most weight difference when compared side by side to a high quality down bag, while with something like a synthetic insulated jacket the difference will be less. Down sleeping bag Down & Synthetic Backpacking Gear: Conclusion As a backpacker in the mountain west, my personal choice is to go all down – and I appreciate the weight that’s saved, the investment over the long-term, and the extra space I get in my pack. I do take extra precautions to keep that gear dry – packing it all in a waterproof dry bag and then inside a highly water-resistant backpack. However, if your pack is more on the sort of waterproof side, a trash compactor bag used as a pack liner is a great way to provide additional protection from water. Trips where it starts to rain, and doesn’t stop for several days, have been the only challenge to this system where the sleeping bag can start to absorb moisture during the night and from tent condensation and has no opportunity to dry – but this doesn’t lead to a complete collapse of the bag. In this situation a 20 degree bag may turn into something more resembling a 30 degree bag until it can dry, and having the ability to toss a hot Nalgene in my Zpacks 20 degree sleeping bag is nice to have. On the trail, I certainly appreciate the lighter weight of down gear and the increased compressibility. Medium weight down parka That said, if I had a synthetic 30 degree bag and a down 30 degree bag and was planning to only pack in a few miles and setup a basecamp for several days, then hike out with a forecast calling for rain the entire time with lows in the 30’s, I’d probably pack in the synthetic. Moving daily on a thru-hike or high mileage backpacking trip? I’d choose down. If you’ll be hiking in an environment where moisture is frequently encountered for long periods of time, one strategy is to go for the down bag and combine that with a synthetic jacket or vice-versa. Down or synthetic, at home make sure to dry out your insulation gear after a trip and store it uncompressed, either hanging or stored very loosely in a breathable, large cotton storage bag and when needed, give it a good wash between seasons. The best choice depends on your own backpacking style and the conditions you’ll encounter, but whether you choose to go all down, all synthetic, or mix and match for the best of both worlds all 3 of these strategies are well-suited and workable when it comes to typical backpacking conditions. And frankly, if the gear itself is good enough – I’m not one to automatically rule something out because it’s not down or not synthetic. In all cases, you want to take every effort to keep your sleeping and insulation gear from getting soaked and take care of it at home after the trip, and by doing so you’ll be on a good track towards both having warm gear in camp and using your insulated gear on countless trips over the years. You can find a full selection of insulated backpacking gear at REI. Down insulated jackets can be found here and you can shop down sleeping bags here. For synthetic you can view their selection of synthetic insulated jackets and synthetic sleeping bags.